BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    institutional building building expert Seattle Washington hospital construction building expert Seattle Washington casino resort building expert Seattle Washington condominium building expert Seattle Washington production housing building expert Seattle Washington concrete tilt-up building expert Seattle Washington tract home building expert Seattle Washington Subterranean parking building expert Seattle Washington parking structure building expert Seattle Washington multi family housing building expert Seattle Washington landscaping construction building expert Seattle Washington housing building expert Seattle Washington custom home building expert Seattle Washington mid-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington townhome construction building expert Seattle Washington Medical building building expert Seattle Washington custom homes building expert Seattle Washington industrial building building expert Seattle Washington condominiums building expert Seattle Washington high-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington retail construction building expert Seattle Washington structural steel construction building expert Seattle Washington
    Seattle Washington construction expert witness public projectsSeattle Washington multi family design expert witnessSeattle Washington ada design expert witnessSeattle Washington roofing and waterproofing expert witnessSeattle Washington engineering expert witnessSeattle Washington consulting general contractorSeattle Washington contractor expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Seattle, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seattle Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kitsap County
    Local # 4944
    5251 Auto Ctr Way
    Bremerton, WA 98312

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362
    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Seattle Washington


    Housing Starts in U.S. Surge to Seven-Year High as Weather Warms

    Judge Halts Sale of Brazilian Plywood

    Top 10 Lessons Learned from a Construction Attorney

    SFAA Commends U.S. Senate for Historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill

    Spearin Doctrine: Alive, Well and Thriving on its 100th Birthday

    California Team Secures Appellate Victory on Behalf of Celebrity Comedian Kathy Griffin in Dispute with Bel Air Neighbor

    Bad News for Buyers: U.S. Mortgage Rates Hit Highest Since 2014

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    Washington Court Tunnels Deeper Into the Discovery Rule

    The Simple Reason Millennials Aren't Moving Out Of Their Parents' Homes: They're Crushed By Debt

    You’re Only as Good as Those with Whom You Contract

    Los Angeles Team Secures Summary Judgment for Hotel Owner & Manager in Tenant’s Lawsuit

    China Bans Tallest Skyscrapers Following Safety Concerns

    NYC’s Developers Plow Ahead With Ambitious Plans to Reshape City

    California Supreme Court Holds that Requirement of Prejudice for Late Notice Defense is a Fundamental Public Policy of the State for Choice of Law Analysis

    BHA Has a Nice Swing: Firm Supports NCHV and Final Salute at 2017 WCC Seminar

    Reminder: Just Being Incorporated Isn’t Enough

    Fifth Circuit Rules that Settlements in Underlying Action Constitute "Other Insurance"

    Who is Responsible for Construction Defect Repairs?

    Wendel Rosen Construction Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Although Property Damage Arises From An Occurrence, Coverage Barred By Business Risk Exclusions

    "Ordinance or Law" Provision Mandates Coverage for Roof Repair

    Here's How Much You Can Make by Renting Out Your Home

    Vertical vs. Horizontal Exhaustion – California Supreme Court Issues Ruling Favorable to Policyholders

    Valerie A. Moore and Christopher Kendrick are JD Supra’s 2020 Readers’ Choice Award Recipients

    Chapman Glucksman Press Release

    ASCE Statement on Passage of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2022

    LA Lakers Partially Survive Motion to Dismiss COVID-19 Claims

    Litigation Privilege Saves the Day for Mechanic’s Liens

    Applying Mighty Midgets, NY Court Awards Legal Expenses to Insureds Which Defeated Insurer’s Coverage Claims

    Latosha Ellis Joins The National Black Lawyers Top 40 Under 40

    Trio of White and Williams Attorneys Named Top Lawyers by Delaware Today

    Major Change to Residential Landlord Tenant Law

    Ireland Said to Plan Home Loans Limits to Prevent Bubble

    Insured's Complaint Against Flood Insurer Survives Motion to Dismiss

    U.S. Supreme Court Halts Enforcement of the OSHA Vaccine or Test Mandate

    Chambers USA 2021 Recognizes Five Partners and Two Practices at Lewis Brisbois

    Supreme Court of Washington State Upholds SFAA Position on Spearin Doctrine

    Dreyer v. Am. Natl. Prop. & Cas. Co. Or: Do Not Enter into Nunn-Agreements for Injuries that Occurred After Expiration of the Subject Insurance Policy

    CEB’s Mechanics Liens and Related Remedies – 2014 Update

    White House Hopefuls Make Pitches to Construction Unions

    Famed NYC Bridge’s Armor Is Focus of Suit Against French Company

    Construction Termination Issues Part 6: This is the End (Tips for The Design Professional)

    Couple Sues for Construction Defects in Manufactured Home

    Patagonia Will Start Paying for Homeowners' Solar Panels

    Hamptons Home Up for Foreclosure That May Set Record

    The G2G Year in Review: 2020

    Naples, Florida, Is Getting So Expensive That City Workers Can’t Afford It

    Renters Trading Size for Frills Fuel U.S. Apartment Boom

    Limiting Services Can Lead to Increased Liability
    Corporate Profile

    SEATTLE WASHINGTON BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Seattle, Washington Building Expert Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Seattle's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Seattle, Washington

    Know your Obligations: Colorado’s Statutory Expansions of the Implied Warranty of Habitability Are Now in Effect

    November 04, 2019 —
    The Colorado legislature had a busy session this year. Among the several significant bills it enacted, HB1170 strengthens tenant protections under the implied warranty of habitability. It became effective on August 2, 2019, so landlords and tenants alike are now subject to its requirements. The bill makes numerous changes to Colorado’s implied warranty of habitability, and interested parties should review the bill in detail. Landlords in particular may want to consider retaining legal counsel to make sure they have proper procedures in place to promptly deal with any habitability complaints within the new required timelines. This posting is not intended to provide a comprehensive guide to the changed law, but simply to highlight some of the most significant changes. With that caveat, landlords and tenants should be aware that as of August 2, 2019:
    • The following conditions are now deemed to make a residential residence uninhabitable for the purposes of the implied warranty of habitability:
      • The presence of mold, which is defined as “microscopic organisms or fungi that can grow in damp conditions in the interior of a building.”
      • A refrigerator, range stove, or oven (“Appliance”) included within a residential premises by a landlord for the use of the tenant that did not conform “to applicable law at the time of installation” or that is not “maintained in good working order.” Nothing in this statute requires a landlord to provide any appliances, but these requirements apply if the landlord either agreed to provide appliances in a written agreement or provided them at the inception of the tenant’s occupancy.
      • Other conditions that “materially interfere with the tenant’s life, health or safety.”
      Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Luke Mcklenburg, Snell & Wilmer
      Mr. Mecklenburg may be contacted at lmecklenburg@swlaw.com

      Insurer Prevails on Summary Judgment for Bad Faith Claim

      July 16, 2023 —
      The court granted summary judgment to the insurer on the insured's claim for bad faith due to denial of the claim. Treigle v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87786 (E.D. La. May 19, 2023). The insured's home sustained serious water damage due to Hurricane in August 2021. Her policy with State Farm excluded losses related to surface water and mold. The insured reported the loss from Hurricane Ida after she returned to her home and found two inches of standing water in the house. State Farm advised the insured to hire a water mitigation company to help with the water. The insured contacted 7 Brothers Company to start mitigation, including tearing out the disposing of wet building materials. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
      Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

      Old Case Teaches New Tricks

      March 16, 2017 —
      Eight years after completion of the wharf project, Zachry and the Port of Houston continue to slug it out in the appellate courts and continue to refi ne Texas construction law along the way. In the latest appellate opinion, the Court of Appeals details the general contractor’s control of the means and methods of their work without interference from a governmental entity. It also supports a subcontractor’s use of a pass-through claim as a cost efficient way to recover damages. By now most of us are familiar with the project and the previous decisions. Zachry sued the Port claiming breach after the Port denied Zachry the right to continue construction using its frozen cutoff wall. The Texas Supreme Court upheld the jury’s $20 million verdict for Zachry, ruling that the Port’s “no damages for delay” clause would not bar Zachry’s claim in light of the Port’s active interference with Zachry’s work. The Supreme Court then sent the case back to the Court of Appeals to consider other arguments that the Port had made. That led to the most recent decision. In December, 2016, the Houston Fourteenth Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Zachry on all issues and affirmed the jury verdict. In doing so, the Court of Appeals provides several lessons or reminders on Texas Construction law. Reprinted courtesy of Angela A.L. Connor, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. and Curtis W. Martin, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. Ms. Connor may be contacted at aconnor@pecklaw.com Mr. Martin may be contacted at cmartin@pecklaw.com Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of

      Changes to Va. Code Section 43-13: Another Arrow in a Subcontractor’s Quiver

      November 02, 2020 —
      As is always the case here in Virginia, our General Assembly has made some legislative changes that affect construction contracting. One of these changes is an amendment to Va. Code 43-13 found in the mechanic’s lien section of the Virginia Code. This section of the code has always required that any money paid to a contractor must first go toward paying its subcontractors, suppliers and laborers prior to being used for any other purpose. Prior to 2020, the only remedy for violaiton of Va. Code 43-13 was to go to the local Commonwealth’s Attorney and request a prosecution of the wrongdoer. For various reasons, including that such action did not get the subcontractor or supplier that remained unpaid under this section paid, this remedy was not often pursued except in the most egrigious cases. A key change in the statute occurred during the 2020 legislative session states as follows:
      Any breach or violation of this section may give rise to a civil cause of action for a party in contract with the general contractor or subcontractor, as appropriate; however, this right does not affect a contractor’s or subcontractor’s right to withhold payment for failure to properly perform labor or furnish materials on the project. Any contract or subcontract provision that allows a contracting party to withhold funds due under one contract or subcontract for alleged claims or damages due on another contract or subcontract is void as against public policy.
      Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
      Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

      Construction Defect Attorneys Call for Better Funding of Court System

      June 28, 2013 —
      The construction defect law firm Anderson Shoech has a solution to some of the problems with the California courts. They note that cases often work their way through the system more slowly than they did in the past, due to “unprecedented cuts of over $1 billion from the State Court budget.” Prior to the cuts, cases were resolved “within six months to a year.” Under the current conditions, those involved in a lawsuit “would be lucky if their case was heard within 18 months of filing and could expect at least two full years to pass.” They recommend that California return to appropriately funding the court system. Failure to do so could cause business to go to states “with a functioning and predictable court system.” Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of

      Coloradoans Deserve More Than Hyperbole and Rhetoric from Plaintiffs’ Attorneys; We Deserve Attainable Housing

      January 09, 2015 —
      As the 2015 Colorado legislative session gets underway, the media attention and discussion regarding the lack of attainable housing, skyrocketing rental rates, and the ongoing state and local efforts to reverse these trends have risen to a dull roar. The hyperbole and rhetoric from those who would oppose any reforms has risen to cacophonous levels. Among the most often quoted talking points from the opposition are that any changes to Colorado’s existing laws would strip homeowners of their right to seek redress for construction defects and that they would virtually insulate construction professionals from such claims. The long and the short of it is that if this year’s legislation looks anything like SB 220 from last year, nothing could be further from the truth. The two main provisions from SB 220 were: 1) protection of a construction professional’s ability to resolve construction defect claims through arbitration; and 2) requirement of informed consent of more than 50% of the owners within a common interest community before a construction defect action could begin. Neither of these changes would strip homeowners of any rights and they certainly would not insulate construction professionals from construction defect actions. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of David M. McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
      Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

      Engineer and CNA Dispute Claim Over Dual 2014 Bridge Failures

      December 15, 2016 —
      An engineering company whose error led to two pedestrian bridge collapses in North Carolina in 2014 that left one worker dead and caused costly damage contends it is being unfairly denied $2 million in potential insurance coverage by its carrier due to what it claims is an “ambiguous” wording of the policy. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Scott Van Voorhis, Engineering News-Record
      ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

      VOSH Jumps Into the Employee Misclassification Pool

      July 30, 2015 —
      The proper classification of workers by construction companies has been on the radar of the Department of Labor for both the US and Virginia governments for quite a while. While most of the misclassification is innocent and not done to create issues, there have been enough instances of purposeful misclassification of certain workers as independent contractors (thus avoiding workers comp and other payroll expenses) that innocent contractors have born the brunt of these issues through increased payroll costs over those that misclassify (in the form of necessarily higher bids, higher overhead, etc.). As an additional deterrent to improper classification of workers, the Virginia Department of Labor and Industry has issued guidelines for what will occur in Virginia Department of Safety and Health (VOSH) cases. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Christopher G. Hill, Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC
      Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com