BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom home building expert Seattle Washington housing building expert Seattle Washington institutional building building expert Seattle Washington casino resort building expert Seattle Washington Medical building building expert Seattle Washington office building building expert Seattle Washington retail construction building expert Seattle Washington high-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington townhome construction building expert Seattle Washington condominiums building expert Seattle Washington condominium building expert Seattle Washington custom homes building expert Seattle Washington parking structure building expert Seattle Washington tract home building expert Seattle Washington Subterranean parking building expert Seattle Washington production housing building expert Seattle Washington mid-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington industrial building building expert Seattle Washington structural steel construction building expert Seattle Washington landscaping construction building expert Seattle Washington concrete tilt-up building expert Seattle Washington hospital construction building expert Seattle Washington
    Seattle Washington building code expert witnessSeattle Washington civil engineer expert witnessSeattle Washington construction defect expert witnessSeattle Washington construction expert witness consultantSeattle Washington consulting general contractorSeattle Washington construction expert witnessesSeattle Washington construction expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Seattle, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seattle Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kitsap County
    Local # 4944
    5251 Auto Ctr Way
    Bremerton, WA 98312

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362
    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Seattle Washington


    How You Plead Allegations to Trigger Liability Insurer’s Duties Is Critical

    California’s Right to Repair Act not an Exclusive Remedy

    Don’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber Basket

    Canada's Ex-Attorney General Set to Testify About SNC-Lavalin Scandal

    The Legal 500 U.S. 2024 Guide Names Peckar & Abramson a Top Tier Firm in Construction Law and Recognizes Nine Attorneys

    The Big Three: The 9th Circuit Joins The 6th Circuit and 7th Circuit in Holding That Sanctions For Bad-Faith Litigation Tactics Can Only Be Awarded Against Individual Lawyers and Not Law Firms

    Quick Note: Expert Testimony – Back to the Frye Test in Florida

    Hunton Insurance Partner Syed Ahmad Named to Benchmark Litigation’s 2019 40 & Under Hot List

    Oracle Sues Procore, Claims Theft of Trade Secrets for ERP Integration

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    Wilke Fleury Welcomes New Civil Litigation Attorney

    Why A Jury Found That Contractor 'Retaliated' Against Undocumented Craft Worker

    California Appeals Court Says Loss of Use Is “Property Damage” Under Liability Policy, and Damages Can be Measured by Diminished Value

    #1 CDJ Topic: McMillin Albany LLC v Superior Court of California

    Alabama Still “An Outlier” on Construction Defects

    Prefabrication Contract Considerations

    Recovering Attorney’s Fees and Treble Damages in Washington DC Condominium Construction Defect Cases

    First Circuit Limits Insurers’ Right to Recoup Defense Costs or Settlement Payments

    Construction Contract Clauses Only a Grinch Would Love – Part 4

    No Coverage for Building's First Collapse, But Disputed Facts on Second Collapse

    Beverly Hills Voters Reject Plan for Enclave's Tallest Building

    When Does a Contractor Legally Abandon a Construction Project?

    Landlords Beware: Subordination Agreements

    Between Scylla and Charybids: The Mediation Privilege and Legal Malpractice Claims

    Breach Of Duty of Good Faith And Fair Dealing Packaged With Contract Disputes Act Claim

    “Families First Coronavirus Response Act”: Emergency Paid Leave for Construction Employers with Fewer Than 500 Employees

    Hawaii Appellate Court Finds Duty to Defend Group Builders Case

    Colorado Supreme Court to Hear Colorado Pool Systems, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance Company, et al.

    Feds, County Seek Delay in Houston $7B Road Widening Over Community Impact

    Brazil's Detained Industry Captain Says No Plea Deals Coming

    Century Communities Acquires Dunhill Homes Las Vegas Operations

    War-Torn Ukraine Looks to Europe’s Green Plans for Reconstruction Ideas

    General Partner Is Not Additional Insured For Construction Defect Claim

    The Power of Team Bonding: Transforming Workplaces for the Better

    Protecting Expert Opinions: Lessons Regarding Attorney-Client Privilege and Expert Retention in Construction Litigation

    Liability Coverage for Claims of Publishing Secret Data Does Not Require Access by Others

    Florida Law: Interplay of SIR and the Made-Whole Doctrine

    Joint Venture Dispute Over Profits

    Gone Fishing: Tenant’s Insurer Casts A Line Seeking To Subrogate Against The Landlord

    New York’s Highest Court Weighs in on N.Y. Labor Law

    The Economic Loss Rule: From Where Does the Duty Arise?

    Lucky No. 7: Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Issues Pro-Policyholder Decision Regarding Additional Insured Coverage for Upstream Parties

    Nuclear Energy Gets a Much-Needed Boost

    Gordon & Rees Ranked #4 of Top 50 Construction Law Firms in the Nation by Construction Executive Magazine

    In Pennsylvania, Contractors Can Be Liable to Third Parties for Obvious Defects in Completed Work

    The Law Clinic Paves Way to the Digitalization of Built Environment Processes

    U.S. Home Prices Climbed 0.1% in July as Gains Slowed

    Visual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea Aero

    Water Leak Covered for First Thirteen Days

    Embattled SNC-Lavalin Files Ethics Appeal, Realigns Structure
    Corporate Profile

    SEATTLE WASHINGTON BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 7,000 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Seattle, Washington Building Expert Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Seattle's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Seattle, Washington

    Mortgage Applications in U.S. Jump 11.6% as Refinancing Surges

    October 22, 2014 —
    Mortgage applications in the U.S. soared last week as a plunge in borrowing costs led to biggest gain in home refinancing since January 2012. The Mortgage Bankers Association’s index rose 11.6 percent in the period ended Oct. 17, the biggest gain since January, after a 5.6 percent advance the week before, figures from the Washington-based group showed today. The refinancing gauge jumped 23.3 percent while the purchase applications measure dropped 4.6 percent. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Danielle Trubow, Bloomberg
    Ms. Trubow may be contacted at dtrubow@bloomberg.net

    Bidders Shortlisted as Oroville Dam Work Schedule is Set

    April 13, 2017 —
    In a race to fix the damaged Oroville Dam’s main spillway by November, the California Dept. of Water Resources, the operator of the country’s tallest dam, is going to bid with a 65%-complete design that breaks recovery efforts into three parts, with an ultimate goal of doubling the main spillway’s release capacity to 270,000 cu ft per second. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of JT Long, ENR
    ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

    New York City Dept. of Buildings Explores Drones for Facade Inspections

    December 13, 2021 —
    Drones have only seen limited use in New York City for construction documentation and facade inspections due to restrictive local ordinances. But that may be changing with the release of a new report from the New York City Dept. of Buildings, which sees future potential for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to be used in building facade inspections. Reprinted courtesy of Jeff Rubenstone, Engineering News-Record Mr. Rubenstein may be contacted at rubenstonej@enr.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Resolving Condominium Construction Defect Warranty Claims in Maryland

    September 04, 2018 —
    A Guide for Maryland Condominium Associations Newly constructed and newly converted condominiums in Maryland often contain concealed or “latent” construction defects. Left undetected and unrepaired, latent defects stemming from the original construction of a condominium can cause extensive damage over time, requiring associations to assess their members for unanticipated repair costs that could have been avoided by making timely developer warranty claims. This article provides a general overview of how Maryland condominium associations transitioning from developer control can proactively identify and resolve construction defect claims with condominium developers and builders before warranty and other legal rights expire. This proactive approach typically results in an amicable resolution without the need for litigation. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Nicholas D. Cowie, Cowie & Mott
    Mr. Cowie may be contacted at ndc@cowiemott.com

    Pushing the Edge: Crews Carve Dam Out of Remote Turkish Mountains

    July 04, 2023 —
    Rugged Construction | Part Two of an ENR Series On a cold, gray day in late March, the mountains on the drive to the Yusufeli hydroelectric dam project site in northeastern Turkey seem ominous. With the highest of these rising more than 3,000 meters above sea level—some of them snow-capped—the jagged rock formations look stark and imposing, the type only a trained professional should attempt to cross. Reprinted courtesy of Pam McFarland, Engineering News-Record Ms. McFarland may be contacted at mcfarlandp@enr.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Workers Hurt in Casino Floor Collapse

    February 10, 2012 —

    More than a dozen construction workers fell about thirty feet when a floor collapsed in a Cincinnati casino. The workers were pouring cement on the second-floor level when the accident happened. The area in question will be the gaming area in the completed casino. Scott Allen, OSHA’s regional spokesperson, said their investigation of the accident would probably take about a month to complete.

    The cause of the collapse is still undetermined. Although the weather has been wet in the area, experts thought it unlikely to be the cause. A construction forensics professor at Ohio State University said that “concrete pouring is very common” and that “you cannot go wrong unless something happens with the connection.” Engineering experts said it was more likely an issue with the metal decking.

    Read the full story…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Policy's Limitation Period for Seeking Replacement Costs Not Enforced Where Unreasonable

    March 12, 2014 —
    The New York Court of Appeals determined that a two year period for obtaining replacement costs for damage to property was unenforceable where the property could not be reasonably replaced in two years. Executive Plaza, LLC v. Peerless Ins. Co., 2014 WL 551251 (N.Y. Ct. App. Feb. 13, 2014). Plaintiff's office building was severely damaged in a fire on February 23, 2007. It cost more than a million dollars to restore the building to its previous condition. Plaintiff had $1 million in coverage from Peerless. The policy provided that replacement costs for any loss would be paid after the damaged property was repaired. The insured was required to make the repairs as soon as possible. Further, the policy provided that any legal action against the insurer had to be brought within two years of the loss. Peerless paid the "actual cash value" of the destroyed building pursuant to the policy in the amount of $757,812.50. Peerless informed the plaintiff that it would have to provide documentation of the completion of repairs to collect the full replacement value, another $242,187.50. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    No Interlocutory Appeals of "Garden-Variety" Contract Disputes

    March 12, 2015 —
    Colorado’s new procedure for interlocutory appeals has its limits. In the recent decision of Rich v. Ball Ranch Partnership, ___ P.3d ___, 2014 COA 6 (2015), the Colorado Court of Appeals held that Appellate Rule 4.2 does not permit interlocutory review of questions of law in “garden-variety” or “run-of-the-mill” contract disputes. This resolves a subtle question that has been lingering since Colorado first created the interlocutory appeal process four years ago. Prior to 2011, Colorado did not permit civil litigants to seek appellate review prior to final judgment, except in a small handful of situations. As I discussed in an article at the time, this changed with the passage of C.R.S. § 13-4-102.1 and the adoption of Rule 4.2, which granted the court of appeals discretion to permit the immediate appeal of certain district court orders. These provisions allowed parties to seek interlocutory review of orders before the conclusion of a case if a district court could certify that (1) immediate review might promote a more orderly disposition or establish a final disposition of the litigation, and (2) the order involved a controlling and unresolved question of law. The rule was patterned after 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), which provides similar relief in the federal courts. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jesse Howard Witt, The Witt Law Firm
    Mr. Witt welcomes comments at www.acerbicwitt.com