BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    production housing building expert Cambridge Massachusetts Medical building building expert Cambridge Massachusetts structural steel construction building expert Cambridge Massachusetts Subterranean parking building expert Cambridge Massachusetts condominiums building expert Cambridge Massachusetts townhome construction building expert Cambridge Massachusetts custom home building expert Cambridge Massachusetts concrete tilt-up building expert Cambridge Massachusetts tract home building expert Cambridge Massachusetts retail construction building expert Cambridge Massachusetts housing building expert Cambridge Massachusetts high-rise construction building expert Cambridge Massachusetts low-income housing building expert Cambridge Massachusetts custom homes building expert Cambridge Massachusetts condominium building expert Cambridge Massachusetts hospital construction building expert Cambridge Massachusetts casino resort building expert Cambridge Massachusetts multi family housing building expert Cambridge Massachusetts mid-rise construction building expert Cambridge Massachusetts office building building expert Cambridge Massachusetts parking structure building expert Cambridge Massachusetts institutional building building expert Cambridge Massachusetts
    Cambridge Massachusetts construction scheduling and change order evaluation expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts OSHA expert witness constructionCambridge Massachusetts window expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts structural engineering expert witnessesCambridge Massachusetts roofing and waterproofing expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts building code compliance expert witnessCambridge Massachusetts construction expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Massachusetts Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Cambridge Massachusetts

    No state license required for general contracting. Licensure required for plumbing and electrical trades. Companies selling home repair services must be registered with the state.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Builders Association of Central Massachusetts Inc
    Local # 2280
    51 Pullman Street
    Worcester, MA 01606

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10

    Massachusetts Home Builders Association
    Local # 2200
    700 Congress St Suite 200
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Greater Boston
    Local # 2220
    700 Congress St. Suite 202
    Quincy, MA 02169

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10

    North East Builders Assn of MA
    Local # 2255
    170 Main St Suite 205
    Tewksbury, MA 01876

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders and Remodelers Association of Western Mass
    Local # 2270
    240 Cadwell Dr
    Springfield, MA 01104

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10

    Bristol-Norfolk Home Builders Association
    Local # 2211
    65 Neponset Ave Ste 3
    Foxboro, MA 02035

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders & Remodelers Association of Cape Cod
    Local # 2230
    9 New Venture Dr #7
    South Dennis, MA 02660

    Cambridge Massachusetts Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Cambridge Massachusetts


    Will Colorado Pass a Construction Defect Reform Bill in 2016?

    Texas Jury Awards $5.3 Million to Company Defamed by Union: Could it work in Pennsylvania?

    The Cross-Party Exclusion: The Hazards of Additional Named Insured Provisions

    Houston’s High Housing Demand due to Employment Growth

    Can a Lease Force a Tenant's Insurer to Defend the Landlord?

    Professional Services Exclusion in CGL Policies

    Utah Supreme Court Allows Citizens to Block Real Estate Development Project by Voter Referendum

    Congratulations to Wilke Fleury’s 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars!!

    Duty to Defend Construction Defect Case Triggered by Complaint's Allegations

    Mitigating Mold Exposure in Manufacturing and Multifamily Buildings

    COVID-19 Response: California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board Implements Sweeping New Regulations to Prevent COVID-19 in the Workplace

    Workers at Two NFL Stadiums Test Positive for COVID-19, But Construction Continues

    Negligent Misrepresentation Claim Does Not Allege Property Damage, Barring Coverage

    ASCE Statement On White House "Accelerating Infrastructure Summit"

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (5/29/24) – Megaprojects on the Rise, Agency Guidance for CRE, and an Upbeat Forecast for Commercial Real Estate Investment

    The Ghosts of Tariffs Past May Help Us in the Future

    Reasonable Expectations – Pennsylvania’s Case by Case Approach to the Sutton Rule

    Norfolk Southern Agrees to $310M Settlement With Feds Over 2023 Ohio Derailment

    A Vision and Strategy for the Adoption of Open International Standards

    Construction Contract Clauses Which Go Bump in the Night – Part 1

    Georgia Law: “An Occurrence Can Arise Where Faulty Workmanship Causes Unforeseen or Unexpected Damage to Other Property”

    Federal District Court Continues to Find Construction Defects do Not Arise From An Occurrence

    Four Key Steps for a Successful Construction Audit Process

    Drug Company Provides Cure for Development Woes

    Smart Cities Offer New Ideas for Connectivity

    10 Answers to Those Nagging Mechanics Lien Questions Keeping You Up at Night. Kind of

    Is It Time to Revisit Construction Defects in Kentucky?

    New York Considering Legislation That Would Create Statute of Repose For Construction

    The EEOC Is Actively Targeting the Construction Industry

    Your Work Exclusion Applies to Damage to Tradesman's Property, Not Damage to Other Property

    Taking Service Network Planning to the Next Level

    Structural Failure of Precast-Concrete Span Sets Back Sydney Metro Job

    Because I Haven’t Mentioned Mediation Lately. . .

    Can Baltimore Get a Great Bridge?

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    Endorsement to Insurance Policy Controls

    New York’s Second Department Holds That Carrier Must Pay Judgment Obtained by Plaintiff as Carrier Did Not Meet Burden to Prove Willful Non-Cooperation

    Think Twice Before Hedging A Position Or Defense On A Speculative Event Or Occurrence

    The Flood Insurance Reform Act May be Extended to 2016

    Behavioral Science Meets Construction: Insights from Whistle Rewards

    Construction Up in Northern Ohio

    Gilroy Homeowners Sue over Leaky Homes

    Increasing Use of Construction Job Cameras

    New York State Trial Court: Non-Cumulation Provision in Excess Policies Mandates “All Sums” Allocation

    Newmeyer & Dillion Welcomes Three Associates to Newport Beach Office

    COVID-19 Business Closure and Continuity Compliance Resource

    A Reminder to Get Your Contractor’s License in Virginia

    NY Court Holds Excess Liability Coverage Could Never be Triggered Where Employers’ Liability Policy Provided Unlimited Insurance Coverage

    Boilerplate Contract Language on Permits could cause Problems for Contractors

    Architecture, Robotics, and the Importance of Human Interaction – An Interview with Prof. Kathrin Dörfler
    Corporate Profile

    CAMBRIDGE MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Cambridge, Massachusetts Building Expert Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Just When You Thought General Contractors Were Necessary Parties. . .

    November 30, 2020 —
    Did you think that a subcontractor had to name a general contractor in a mechanic’s lien suit? I did. Did you think that nothing about this changed in the case where a Virginia mechanic’s lien was “bonded off” pursuant to Va. Code Section 43-71? I did. Well, a recent Virginia Supreme Court case, Synchronized Construction Services Inc. v. Prav Lodging LLC, seems to at least create some doubt as to whether the a general contractor is a “necessary” party to a lawsuit by a subcontractor in the case where a bond is posted for release of a mechanic’s lien. In Prav Lodging, the facts were a bit unusual. The day after the mechanic’s lien was recorded by Synchronized Construction Services, Inc. (“Synchronized”) the construction manager, Paris Development Group, the construction manager and de facto general contractor, went out of business. Despite this fact, and after the lien was bonded off, Synchronized sued to enforce the lien and for breach of contract against Paris. The wrinkle here is that Synchronized was unable to serve several defendants, among them Paris, within one year of filing suit as required by Virginia statute. In the Circuit Court, the financing bank moved to dismiss the suit for failure to serve necessary parties. The Circuit Court dismissed the breach of contract count but refused to dismiss the mechanic’s lien count on this basis. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Insured Survives Motion for Summary Judgment in Collapse Case

    May 30, 2022 —
    The insurer's motion to exclude expert testimony and for summary judgment in a cases involving collapse was denied. Firehouse Church Ministries v. Church Mut. Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53959 (D. Miss. March 25, 2022). A roof truss, a framework supporting the roof, collapsed in the church. The cause was either deterioration over time or a nearby tornado. The Church claimed that before the tornado passed, the church was clean and in orderly condition. When inspected after the tornado, there was debris and wreckage, including tin, insulation dust, plaster, and ceiling tile, on the floor. The Church had a contractor, Gregory Blanchard, inspect. He added posts to support the truss and made other repairs, but informed the Church that the damage was worse than expected and it could not be easily repaired. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    10-story Mass Timber 'Rocking' Frame Sails Through Seismic Shake Tests

    June 19, 2023 —
    A 10-story mass timber “rocking” frame, designed to be resilient enough to withstand powerful earthquakes with little or no structural damage, proved its worth May 9 during seismic simulations at the largest high-performance outdoor shake table, located at the University of California San Diego. Reprinted courtesy of Nadine M. Post, Engineering News-Record Ms. Post may be contacted at postn@enr.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Fifth Circuit -- Damage to Property Beyond Insured’s Product/Work Not Precluded By ‘Your Product/Your Work Exclusion’

    January 24, 2022 —
    On January 11, 2022, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Siplast, Incorporated v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 795 (5th Cir. Jan. 11, 2022), finding that an insurer had a duty to defend its insured in a construction defect case where the underlying complaint alleged damage to property beyond the product and work of the insured. Siplast, Inc. (Siplast) had contracted with the Archdiocese of New York (the Archdiocese) to install a roof membrane system at a high school in the Bronx, New York. Id. at *1. As part of the contract, Siplast guaranteed that the roof membrane system would remain in a watertight condition for at least twenty years. Id. at *2. If it did not, Siplast would repair the roof membrane system at its own expense. Id. Several years after the installation, the Archdiocese observed water damage in the ceiling tiles at the high school. Id. The Archdiocese contacted Siplast, who attempted to repair the damage and prevent further leaks; however, leaks and resultant damage continued to occur. Id. Siplast subsequently refused to make any more improvements to the roof. Id. Reprinted courtesy of Anthony L. Miscioscia, White and Williams LLP and Marianne Bradley, White and Williams LLP Mr. Miscioscia may be contacted at misciosciaa@whiteandwilliams.com Ms. Bradley may be contacted at bradleym@whiteandwilliams.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Flint Water Crisis Prompts Call for More Federal Oversight

    August 28, 2018 —
    WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal watchdog is calling on the Environmental Protection Agency to strengthen its oversight of state drinking water systems nationally and respond more quickly to public health emergencies such as the lead-in-the water crisis in Flint, Michigan . In a 74-page report released Thursday, the EPA's inspector general report pointed to "oversight lapses" at the federal, state and local levels in the response to Flint's contaminated drinking water. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Engineering News-Record
    ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com

    Safety Data: Noon Presents the Hour of Greatest Danger

    April 20, 2017 —
    Unlike previous research into construction fatalities, a new review of three years of Labor Dept. data found that most occur between 10 am and 3 pm, with a peak at noon. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Richard Korman, ENR
    Mr. Korman may be contacted at kormanr@enr.com

    Los Angeles Wildfires to Impact Profitability of US Property Insurers, Says GlobalData

    February 03, 2025 —
    The Los Angeles (LA) area in the US has witnessed a devastating impact from a series of wildfires that erupted since the second week of January. There were 312 wildfires that resulted in 28 deaths and the destruction of 16,255 structures as of 29 January, with the Palisades and Eaton wildfires continuing to burn, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Estimates from the University of California suggest that the total damage from the LA wildfires could surpass $20 billion. Consequently, US insurers may see increased claims in 2025 across various insurance lines, potentially affecting their profitability, says GlobalData, a leading data and analytics company. Manogna Vangari, Insurance Analyst at GlobalData, comments: "The recent LA wildfires are expected to impose significant financial burdens on property and casualty insurers, with damages potentially exceeding billions of dollars. The destruction affects both residential and commercial properties, particularly high-value homes and businesses, leading to anticipated insured losses to be among the highest in California's history." Property insurance claims are projected to represent a 13.1% share of total general insurance claims in the US in 2025, totaling $247 billion. Incurred losses are anticipated to rise by 7.5% in 2025, reaching $193.6 billion from $180.1 billion in 2024. However, the full effect of wildfires may push actual claims even higher. Consequently, the profitability of the US general insurance sector is expected to be notably affected, with the average combined ratio predicted to exceed 100% in 2025. According to GlobalData's Global Insurance Database, the US property insurance industry is expected to grow at a CAGR of 7.3% over 2025–29, from $416.3 billion in 2025 to $551.1 billion in 2029, in terms of gross written premiums (GWP). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Deductibles Limited to Number of Suits Filed Against Insured, Not Number of Actual Plaintiffs

    December 08, 2016 —
    The court limited the number of deductibles to the counterclaims filed against the insured, not the more than 600 plaintiffs who were parties to the three underlying lawsuits. Probuilders Spec. Ins. Co. v. Yarbrough Plastering, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134959 (E.D. Calif. Sept. 29, 2016). Yarbrough entered into contracts with Lenox Homes to provide stucco and drywall services in the homes Lenox would build. Each contract required Yarbrough to indemnify Lenox for any claims resulting from property damage arising out of the performance of the contract. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com