BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    low-income housing building expert Seattle Washington Medical building building expert Seattle Washington concrete tilt-up building expert Seattle Washington casino resort building expert Seattle Washington mid-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington structural steel construction building expert Seattle Washington multi family housing building expert Seattle Washington townhome construction building expert Seattle Washington high-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington Subterranean parking building expert Seattle Washington production housing building expert Seattle Washington housing building expert Seattle Washington institutional building building expert Seattle Washington condominium building expert Seattle Washington industrial building building expert Seattle Washington custom homes building expert Seattle Washington hospital construction building expert Seattle Washington landscaping construction building expert Seattle Washington parking structure building expert Seattle Washington tract home building expert Seattle Washington custom home building expert Seattle Washington retail construction building expert Seattle Washington
    Seattle Washington civil engineer expert witnessSeattle Washington consulting engineersSeattle Washington structural concrete expertSeattle Washington roofing construction expertSeattle Washington defective construction expertSeattle Washington building consultant expertSeattle Washington expert witness commercial buildings
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Seattle, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seattle Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kitsap County
    Local # 4944
    5251 Auto Ctr Way
    Bremerton, WA 98312

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362
    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Seattle Washington


    Builder Waits too Long to Dispute Contract in Construction Defect Claim

    Mississippi Floods Prompt New Look at Controversial Dam Project

    No Additional Insured Coverage Under Umbrella Policy

    Keep Your Construction Claims Alive in Crazy Economic Times

    Nine Haight Attorneys Selected for Best Lawyers®: Ones to Watch 2021

    The Future of Construction Work with Mark Ehrlich

    FBI Makes Arrest Related to Saipan Casino Construction

    Suing a Local Government in Land Use Cases – Part 2 – Procedural Due Process

    Court Calls Lease-Leaseback Project What it is: A Design-Bid-Build Project

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (06/06/23) – Housing Woes, EV Plants and the Debate over Public Financing

    Hundreds Celebrated the Grand Opening of the Associated Builders and Contractors of Southern California Riverside Construction Training Center

    Hybrid Contracts for The Sale of Goods and Services and the Predominant Factor Test

    GRSM Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Lists

    Defense Owed for Product Liability Claims That Do Not Amount to Faulty Workmanship

    What The U.S. Can Learn from China to Bring Its Buildings to New Heights

    Update Coverage for Construction Defect Claims in Colorado

    Failure to Comply with Sprinkler Endorsement Bars Coverage for Fire Damage

    Uniformity in Florida’s Construction Bond Laws Brings About Fairness for the Industry

    Appeals Court Affirms Carrier’s Duty to Pay Costs Taxed Against Insured in Construction Defect Suit

    Proving & Defending Lost Profit Damages

    Congratulations to BWB&O for Ranking in The U.S. News – Best Lawyers ® as “Best Law Firms”!

    Balestreri Potocki & Holmes Attorneys Named 2020 Super Lawyers and Rising Star

    Flow-Down Clauses Can Drown Your Project

    Evaluating Construction Trends From 2023 and Forecasting For 2024

    Another Reason to Always Respond (or Hensel Phelps Wins One!)

    URGENT: 'Catching Some Hell': Hurricane Michael Slams Into Florida

    CA Supreme Court Set to Rule on Important Occurrence Issue Certified by Ninth Circuit

    Workers Compensation Immunity and the Intentional Tort Exception

    Ambiguous Application Questions Preclude Summary Judgment on Rescission Claim

    New York’s 2022 Comprehensive Insurance Disclosure Act: Significant Amendments to the C.P.L.R.

    16 Wilke Fleury Attorneys Featured in Sacramento Magazine 2021 Top Lawyers!

    London Penthouse Will Offer Chance to Look Down at Royalty

    Insurance Litigation Roundup: “Post No Bills!”

    Deescalating Hyper Escalation

    Newark Trial Team Secures Affirmance of ‘No Cause’ Verdict for Nationwide Housing Manager & Developer

    Haight Attorneys Selected to 2018 Southern California Rising Stars List

    Research Institute: A Shared Information Platform Reduces Construction Costs Considerably

    Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute

    Labor Intensive

    Insurance Law Alert: California Supreme Court Limits Advertising Injury Coverage for Disparagement

    Toll Brothers Faces Construction Defect Lawsuit in New Jersey

    A New AAA Study Confirms that Arbitration is Faster to Resolution Than Court – And the Difference Can be Assessed Monetarily

    When a Request for Equitable Adjustment Should Be Treated as a Claim Under the Contract Disputes Act

    Avoid Five Common Fraudulent Schemes Used in Construction

    NARI Addresses Construction Defect Claim Issues for Remodeling Contractors

    Phillips & Jordan Awarded $176M Everglades Restoration Contract

    Adobe Opens New Office Tower and Pledges No Companywide Layoffs in 2023

    Unravel the Facts Before Asserting FDUTPA and Tortious Interference Claims

    Construction Law Breaking News: California Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Beacon Residential Community Association

    When Cyber Crooks Steal Payments, Think Insurance Makes Up The Loss? Think Again.
    Corporate Profile

    SEATTLE WASHINGTON BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Seattle, Washington Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Seattle's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Seattle, Washington

    Top Five General Tips for All Construction Contracts

    October 26, 2020 —
    For this week’s Guest Post Friday here at Musings we welcome Spencer Wiegard. Spencer is a Partner with Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP. He is a member of the firm’s Construction Law and Commercial Litigation practice groups. Spencer focuses his practice in the areas of construction law and construction litigation. Spencer is a member of the Board of Governors for the Virginia State Bar Construction Law and Public Contracts Section, and a member of the Legislative Committee of the Associated General Contractors of Virginia and the Executive Committee for the Roanoke/SW Virginia District of the Associated General Contractors of Virginia. I would like to thank Chris for inviting me to author today’s guest post. Over the past few days, I have found myself wading through the terms and conditions of a lengthy and complicated construction contract, while at the same time aggressively negotiating for Houston house leveling cost readjustments. As I slogged through the legalese, I was reminded of a presentation that I gave earlier this year to the Roanoke District of the Virginia Associated General Contractors. The district’s executive committee asked me to speak to its members concerning the broad topic of “Construction Contracts 101.” At the beginning of my presentation, I passed along my top five general tips for all construction contracts. Although some of these tips may sound like common sense, I often encounter situations where these basic rules are violated by experienced contractors, subcontractors, suppliers and design professionals. My top five general tips for all construction contracts are:
    1. Reduce the terms of the agreement to writing.
      1. The written agreement should include all important and relevant information and terms. If it was important enough to discuss prior to signing the contract, it is important enough to include in the written contract;
      2. At a minimum, include who, what, when, where, how, and how much;
      3. Both parties should sign the written agreement; and
      4. Don’t ignore handwritten changes to the contract, as these changes may either mean that you don’t have a deal, or they may become part of the contract when you sign it.
      Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
      Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

      Assert a Party’s Noncompliance of Conditions Precedent with Particularity

      July 26, 2017 —
      Construction contracts oftentimes and should contain conditions precedent to payment. Conditions precedent apply to both progress payments and final payment. The conditions precedent operate such that payment is NOT due until the conditions are satisfied. The satisfaction of the conditions precedent triggers the payor’s obligation to pay. If a dispute arises due to the payee’s noncompliance with conditions precedent to payment, the noncompliance should be asserted with particularity in the answer and affirmative defenses. For example, if a subcontractor was required to provide lien waivers and releases as a condition precedent to payment, then this should be asserted with particularity as an affirmative defense. If the contractor’s receipt of payment from the owner was a condition precedent to payment to the subcontractor (pay-when-paid), then this should be asserted with particularity as an affirmative defense. Any noncompliance with a condition precedent should be identified as an affirmative defense. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Florida Construction Legal Updates
      Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at Dadelstein@gmail.com

      No Signature, No Problem: Texas Court Holds Contractual Subrogation Waiver Still Enforceable

      April 10, 2023 —
      In Chubb Lloyds Inc. Co. of Tex. v. Buster & Cogdell Builders, LLC, No. 01-21-00503-CV, 2023 Tex. App. LEXIS 676, the Court of Appeals of Texas, First District (Court of Appeals) considered whether the lower court properly dismissed the plaintiff’s subrogation case by enforcing a subrogation waiver in a construction contract which was not fully executed. The contract was signed by only one of the two subrogors and was not signed by the defendant general contractor. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, holding that despite the lack of signatures, the evidence established mutual assent to the contractual terms by all parties. The plaintiff’s subrogors, Jeffrey and Mary Meyer (collectively, the Meyers), retained defendant Buster & Codgell Builders (BCB) to expand their residence. BCB drafted a contract using the American Institute of Architects (AIA) standard form contract for residential construction. The AIA contract included, by reference, a subrogation waiver that applied to BCB and its subcontractors. Prior to beginning the work, BCB emailed Jeffrey Meyer a version of the contract that only had one signature block for both Jeffrey and Mary Meyer. Minutes later, BCB sent a second version of the contract which had a signature line for each of the Meyers. However, Jeffrey Meyer signed the first version of the contract and emailed it back to BCB. In the subject line of his email, Mr. Meyers asked that BCB countersign and return the contract. BCB did not sign and return the contract. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Gus Sara, White and Williams
      Mr. Sara may be contacted at sarag@whiteandwilliams.com

      The Future for Tall Buildings Could Be Greener

      October 01, 2013 —
      Skidmore, Owens and Merrill made its reputation by creating iconic structures of steel, concrete, and glass, but in a new report, the firm puts forth ways in which the first item would be wood. Building codes in many cities stipulate that buildings taller than four stories be built of steel and concrete, but the firm says that it has come up with a way of building structures of 30 stories or more using wood. The tallest wood-framed building currently is only ten stories tall. In order to calculate a comparison, Skidmore, Owens and Merrill designed a forty-two story building based on the design of an existing apartment building. Actually building it would require almost 4 million board-feet of wood. Unlike a typical single-family home (and its 20,000 board-feet of wood), these building would use glue-laminated timber and slabs. The study found that the building would weigh less than half as much, allowing a less massive foundation. If the wood came from sustainable sources, its environmental impact would be drastically reduced. They calculated that instead of 9,500 tons of CO2 emissions for the conventional tower, the wood structure would be responsible for only 2,100 tons of emissions. Skyscrapers will continue to be a feature of large cities. But instead of urban canyons of steel and concrete, in the future those towering buildings might be made of wood. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of

      Green Home Predictions That Are Best Poised to Come True in 2014 and Beyond (guest post)

      July 16, 2014 —
      Today, a guest post on the green design issues that are becoming realities from Penny Olmos, who is associated with Holloway Houston, Inc. a leading industrial lifting equipment manufacturing company. Welcome, Penny! The scorching heat singed us and the winter wave chilled us — more than ever before. What are we heading to? Earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, tornadoes and extreme temperatures? Mother Nature is warning us in myriad ways. And the good news is that we are heeding her calls after long. Saving our natural resources and going green has found many takers. We have seen many eco-friendly homes and buildings designed and created in the last decade. Green homes are here to stay. We look at the popular green home design and construction trends in 2014 that are about to transform the landscape of green realty. Rise of Net Zero Energy Homes It seemed impossible until a couple of years ago but 2014 will witness a rise in net zero energy homes. These are homes with zero net energy consumption. The total amount of energy used by these buildings annually equals the amount of renewable energy created on the property. This is the greenest and the most energy efficient house you can possess. And you do not need to cut down on any of your comforts. There are heating, cooling, entertainment and utility appliances functioning in the house like they would in any other home. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Melissa Dewey Brumback, Construction Law in North Carolina
      Ms. Brumback may be contacted at mbrumback@rl-law.com

      Is the Issuance of a City Use Permit Referable? Not When It Is an Administrative Act

      January 10, 2018 —
      Arizona’s Constitution gives electors in cities, towns, and counties the ability to refer legislation that was enacted by their local elected officials to the ballot for popular vote. Ariz. Const. art. IV, Pt. 1 § 1(8). But only legislative acts are referable; administrative acts are not. In general, a legislative act makes new law and creates policy, is permanent in nature, and is generally applied. On the other hand, an administrative act is one that executes and implements a law already in place. Wennerstrom v. City of Mesa, 169 Ariz. 485, 489-90, 821 P.2d 146, 150-51 (1991). For more than fifty years, Arizona courts have been clear: zoning and rezoning ordinances are legislative acts and therefore referable to popular vote. City of Phoenix v. Fehlner, 90 Ariz. 13, 17, 363 P.2d 607, 609 (1961) (holding that “what constitutes an appropriate zone is primarily for the legislature”); Fritz v. City of Kingman, 191 Ariz 432, 432, 957 P.2d 337, 337 (1998) (noting “we reaffirm our view that zoning decisions are legislative matters subject to referendum”); Pioneer Trust Co. of Arizona v. Pima Cty., 168 Ariz. 61, 64–65, 811 P.2d 22, 25–26 (1991) (holding “that, in Arizona, zoning decisions are legislative acts subject to referendum” and that even a “conditional approval of . . . rezoning was a legislative act”); Cottonwood Dev. v. Foothills Area Coal. of Tucson, Inc., 134 Ariz. 46, 653 P.2d 694 (1982) (analyzing whether zoning referendum complied with statutory requirements); Wait v. City of Scottsdale, 127 Ariz. 107, 108, 618 P.2d 601, 602 (1980) (noting “that the enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances constitute legislative action”); City of Phoenix v. Oglesby, 112 Ariz. 64, 65, 537 P.2d 934, 935 (1975) (“The matter of zoning is appropriately one for the legislative branch of government.”); Queen Creek Land & Cattle Corp. v. Yavapai Cty. Bd. of Sup’rs, 108 Ariz. 449, 452, 501 P.2d 391, 394 (1972) (denying an attempt to enjoin referendum on county’s zoning decision). Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of Adam E. Lang, Snell & Wilmer
      Mr. Lang may be contacted at alang@swlaw.com

      French Government Fines National Architects' Group $1.6M Over Fee-Fixing

      December 09, 2019 —
      The French government’s anti-trust agency has fined the national architects’ registration group and four regional councils $1.64 million (€1.5 million) for price-fixing design fees on public works. Reprinted courtesy of Debra K. Rubin, Engineering News-Record Ms. Rubin may be contacted at rubind@enr.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of

      Economist Predicts Housing Starts to Rise in 2014

      February 12, 2014 —
      David Crowe, chief economist of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), predicts “that single-family home starts in the U.S. could rise more than 30 percent in 2014,” according to Dallas News. “My single-family forecast for 2014 is pretty aggressive — it’s 822,000 starts,” Crowe said to Dallas News. “Which is roughly 200,000 starts more than what we will likely end up with in 2013.” Dallas News also reported specifically on the Texas market. The NAHB forecasts that “by next year, Texas’ housing production will be back to ‘normal’ levels.” However, that is still below “the pre-recession peak” numbers. Read the court decision
      Read the full story...
      Reprinted courtesy of