BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    multi family housing building expert Seattle Washington low-income housing building expert Seattle Washington concrete tilt-up building expert Seattle Washington office building building expert Seattle Washington production housing building expert Seattle Washington structural steel construction building expert Seattle Washington landscaping construction building expert Seattle Washington retail construction building expert Seattle Washington housing building expert Seattle Washington mid-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington Subterranean parking building expert Seattle Washington casino resort building expert Seattle Washington Medical building building expert Seattle Washington tract home building expert Seattle Washington custom home building expert Seattle Washington custom homes building expert Seattle Washington condominium building expert Seattle Washington hospital construction building expert Seattle Washington townhome construction building expert Seattle Washington institutional building building expert Seattle Washington parking structure building expert Seattle Washington high-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington
    Seattle Washington delay claim expert witnessSeattle Washington construction defect expert witnessSeattle Washington fenestration expert witnessSeattle Washington building envelope expert witnessSeattle Washington construction expert witnessSeattle Washington construction expertsSeattle Washington expert witness windows
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Seattle, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seattle Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kitsap County
    Local # 4944
    5251 Auto Ctr Way
    Bremerton, WA 98312

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362
    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Seattle Washington


    Fast-Moving Isaias Dishes Out Disruption in the Mid-Atlantic, Northeast

    Cities' Answer to Sprawl? Go Wild.

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    Does Your 998 Offer to Compromise Include Attorneys’ Fees and Costs?

    Hunton Insurance Partner, Larry Bracken, Elected to the American College of Coverage Counsel

    Serving Notice of Nonpayment Under Miller Act

    Newmeyer & Dillion Appoints Partner Carol Zaist as General Counsel

    A Compilation of Quirky Insurance Claims

    St. Petersburg Florida’s Tallest Condo Tower Allegedly Riddled with Construction Defects

    How to Defend Stucco Allegations

    GRSM Team Wins Summary Judgment in Million-Dollar HOA Dispute

    Pipeline Safety Violations Cause of Explosion that Killed 8

    2023 Executive Insights From Leaders in Construction Law

    Preparing the Next Generation of Skilled Construction Workers: AGC Workforce Development Plan

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    How You Plead Allegations to Trigger Liability Insurer’s Duties Is Critical

    Construction Defects Up Price and Raise Conflict over Water Treatment Expansion

    New Jersey Supreme Court Holding Impacts Allocation of Damages in Cases Involving Successive Tortfeasors

    Michigan Court Waives Goodbye to Subrogation Claims, Except as to Gross Negligence

    What is the Implied Warranty of Habitability?

    A Recap of the Supreme Court’s 2019 Summer Slate

    Musings: Moving or Going into a New Service Area, There is More to It Than Just…

    Drought Dogs Developers in California's Soaring Housing Market

    Construction Contractor “Mean Tweets” Edition

    Limiting Liability: Three Clauses to Consider in your Next Construction Contract

    Bank Sues over Defective Windows

    SEC Proposes Rule Requiring Public Firms to Report Climate Risks

    Privacy In Pandemic: Senators Announce Covid-19 Data Privacy Bill

    Insurance Company Prevails in “Chinese Drywall” Case

    Rescission of Policy for Misrepresentation in Application Reversed

    Flood Policy Does Not Cover Debris Removal from Property

    Adjuster's Report No Substitute for Proof of Loss Under Flood Policy

    #6 CDJ Topic: Construction Defect Legislative Developments

    The American Rescue Plan Act: What Restaurants Need to Act on NOW

    CDJ’s #2 Topic of the Year: Ewing Constr. Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 2014 Tex. LEXIS 39 (Tex. Jan.17, 2014)

    Crowdfunding Comes to Manhattan’s World Trade Center

    Home Builders Wear Many Hats

    World’s Biggest Crane Lifts Huge Steel Ring at U.K. Nuclear Site

    Michigan Supreme Court Finds Faulty Subcontractor Work That Damages Insured’s Work Product May Constitute an “Occurrence” Under CGL Policy

    White and Williams Announces Partner and Counsel Promotions

    Don’t Put All Your Eggs in the Silent-Cyber Basket

    Colorado Statutes of Limitations and Repose, A First Step in Construction Defect Litigation

    California Supreme Court Finds Vertical Exhaustion Applies to First-Level Excess Policies

    A Community Constantly on the Brink of Disaster

    South Carolina’s New Insurance Data Security Act: Pebbles Before a Landslide?

    New York High Court: “Issued or Delivered” Includes Policies Insuring Risks in New York

    Biden Unveils $2.3 Trillion American Jobs Plan

    Construction Law Alert: A Specialty License May Not Be Required If Work Covered By Another License

    Check The Boxes Regarding Contractual Conditions Precedent to Payment

    Court of Appeal Confirms Privette Doctrine as Applied to Passive Conduct of Property Owner
    Corporate Profile

    SEATTLE WASHINGTON BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Seattle, Washington Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Seattle's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Seattle, Washington

    Issues to Watch Out for When Managing Remote Workers

    July 13, 2020 —
    Managing remote workers comes with its share of challenges. The complexities of setting and articulating expectations in a remote work environment – and providing feedback about performance tied to those expectations - adds an additional burden to our already-crowded work lives, particularly for managers who are new to remote supervisory roles. This article highlights some key issues that arise when managing remote workers. Issue 1: Insufficient feedback Annual reviews are not enough. Data clearly reflects that employees who receive regular feedback are happier, and more productive, in their roles. Employees require a “continuous feedback loop” to grow and improve. While many companies started migrating toward continuous feedback before the pandemic, remote work further increases the need for more frequent (formal and informal) check-ins. Organizations must provide management with a toolkit for providing – and receiving – constant feedback, and this toolkit should take into account changes in work styles and modalities of communication when employees are remote. Given the ease with which we can give face-to-face feedback compared to “virtual” feedback, this toolkit becomes even more important when only some employees are remote and others have returned onsite. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Melissa (Powar) Clarke, Payne & Fears
    Ms. Clarke may be contacted at mec@paynefears.com

    FEMA Fire Management Assistance Granted for the French Fire

    July 08, 2024 —
    OAKLAND, Calif. – The Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Region 9 Administrator authorized the use of federal funds on July 4 at 11:37 p.m. PDT / 2:37 a.m. EDT to assist the state of California to combat the French Fire burning in Mariposa County. On July 4, the state of California submitted a request for a Fire Management Assistance Grant (FMAG). At the time of the request, the fire threatened approximately 1,019 homes in and around Mariposa, CA, population 1,300. 95% of the threatened homes are primary residences and 5% are secondary residences. The fire started on July 4, 2024 and had burned more than 790 acres of State and private land. The fire was 0% contained. There are five large fires burning uncontrolled within the State. FMAGs provide federal funding for up to 75 percent of eligible firefighting costs. The Disaster Relief Fund provides allowances for FMAGs through FEMA to assist in fighting fires that threaten to become a greater incident. Eligible costs covered by FMAGs can include expenses for field camps, equipment use, materials, supplies and mobilization, and demobilization activities attributed to fighting the fire. For more information on FMAGs, visit https://www.fema.gov/assistance/public/fire-management-assistance. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Will The New U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Deal Calm Industry Jitters?

    January 13, 2020 —
    News that House Democrats and the Trump administration have come to an agreement on the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) provided a bit of calm in the storm over trade policies that have roiled the construction market since 2017. Bruce Buckley, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Burden Supporting Termination for Default

    January 11, 2021 —
    Terminating a contractor for default is a “‘drastic sanction’ and ‘should be imposed (or sustained) only for good grounds and on solid evidence.’” Cherokee General Corp. v. U.S., 150 Fed.Cl. 270, 278 (Fed.Cl. 2020) (citation omitted). This is true with any termination for default because terminating a contract for default is the harshest recourse that can be taken under a contract. It is a caused-based termination. For this reason, the party terminating a contract for default needs to be in a position to carry its burden supporting the evidentiary basis in exercising the default-based (or caused-based) termination. Stated differently, the party terminating a contract for default needs to justify the reasonableness in terminating the contract for default. A party looking to terminate a contract for default should smartly work with counsel to best position its justification in exercising the termination for default. Likewise, a contractor terminated for default should immediately work with counsel to best position the unreasonableness or the lack of justification for the default-based termination. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    For Breach of Contract Claim, There Needs to be a Breach of a Contractual Duty

    November 15, 2022 —
    Remember this law (and I mean: remember this law!): “An essential element of a claim for breach of contract is the existence of a material breach of a contractual duty.” JD Development I, LLC v. ICS Contractors, LLC, 2022 WL 4587083, *3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022) (citation and quotation omitted). This law is important because how can another party breach of a contract if there is no contractual duty you claim they breached? This question, and, of course, the answer, should not be overlooked from a strategic standpoint because it may dictate what claims you assert, how you assert those claims, and how you present your case from a theme and evidentiary standpoint. JD Development provides an example of why this law is important and how this can play out. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@kirwinnorris.com

    Harlem Developers Reach Deal with Attorney General

    February 25, 2014 —
    Joseph Scarpinito and Shiraz Sanjana, developers of the Mirada condominium in Harlem, New York can avoid a contempt charge from state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, “if they make the required repairs and obtain a permanent certificate of occupancy at the property,” according to The Real Deal. Scarpinito and Sanjana “agreed to deposit $200,000 into an escrow account and make repairs to stop flooding and other defects at the 161 East 110th Street condo, which are required to obtain a certificate of occupancy from the city Department of Buildings.” Last December, the Attorney General “filed suit against the developers, alleging they submitted false filings to his office in claiming that Scarpinito’s 83-year-old mother was the actual developer of the 68-unit condo.” Furthermore, the condo board lawyers submitted a complaint to Schneiderman “detailing extensive defects in the building, including water leaks entering the building from the roof and façade.” The developers have been ordered “to submit weekly reports to the AG’s office detailing progress on the repairs and obtaining the certificate of occupancy.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Job Growth Seen as Good News for North Carolina Housing Market

    November 20, 2013 —
    David Mayo, the president of the Home Builders Association of Hendersonville told housing professionals that “it’s been a tough few years, but by all accounts it’s better now.” Currently, Henderson County, North Carolina is seeing three new jobs created for every building permit issued, which is seen as the critical measure of a region’s economic health, according to Dale Akins, a market research firm. Henderson County has seen a rise in building permits, with 32% more permits issued in the first nine months of 2013 than in the same period of 2012. By contrast, adjacent Transylvania County has seen little job growth and a housing market that has shrunk by 25%. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    EPA Can't Evade Enviro Firm's $2.7M Cleanup Site Pay Claim, US Court Says

    January 25, 2021 —
    A Richmond, Va., federal appeals court has restored an environmental consultant's legal fight for $2.7 million in federal funds to cover work at a Superfund cleanup site it managed, rejecting a lower court’s dismissal of its claim over a technicality. Reprinted courtesy of Mary B. Powers, Engineering News-Record ENR may be contacted at ENR.com@bnpmedia.com Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of