BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    parking structure building expert Fairfield Connecticut landscaping construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut hospital construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut condominiums building expert Fairfield Connecticut high-rise construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut retail construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut custom home building expert Fairfield Connecticut casino resort building expert Fairfield Connecticut Subterranean parking building expert Fairfield Connecticut production housing building expert Fairfield Connecticut office building building expert Fairfield Connecticut Medical building building expert Fairfield Connecticut townhome construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut institutional building building expert Fairfield Connecticut tract home building expert Fairfield Connecticut mid-rise construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut structural steel construction building expert Fairfield Connecticut multi family housing building expert Fairfield Connecticut condominium building expert Fairfield Connecticut low-income housing building expert Fairfield Connecticut custom homes building expert Fairfield Connecticut housing building expert Fairfield Connecticut
    Fairfield Connecticut fenestration expert witnessFairfield Connecticut hospital construction expert witnessFairfield Connecticut building consultant expertFairfield Connecticut engineering expert witnessFairfield Connecticut construction code expert witnessFairfield Connecticut contractor expert witnessFairfield Connecticut eifs expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    Connecticut Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Case law precedent


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Fairfield Connecticut

    License required for electrical and plumbing trades. No state license for general contracting, however, must register with the State.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders & Remo Assn of Fairfield Co
    Local # 0780
    433 Meadow St
    Fairfield, CT 06824

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Expert 10/ 10

    Builders Association of Eastern Connecticut
    Local # 0740
    20 Hartford Rd Suite 18
    Salem, CT 06420

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of New Haven Co
    Local # 0720
    2189 Silas Deane Highway
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Hartford Cty Inc
    Local # 0755
    2189 Silas Deane Hwy
    Rocky Hill, CT 06067

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of NW Connecticut
    Local # 0710
    110 Brook St
    Torrington, CT 06790

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Connecticut (State)
    Local # 0700
    3 Regency Dr Ste 204
    Bloomfield, CT 06002

    Fairfield Connecticut Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Fairfield Connecticut


    No Coverage for Sink Hole Loss

    Apartment Investors Turn to Suburbs After Crowding Cities

    New Orleans Drainage System Recognized as Historic Civil Engineering Landmark

    US Attorney Alleges ADA Violations in Chicago Cubs Stadium Renovation

    Georgia Amends Anti-Indemnity Statute

    Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court Clarifies Pennsylvania’s Strict Liability Standard

    How Many New Home Starts are from Teardowns?

    GSA Releases Updated Standards to Accelerate Federal Buildings Toward Zero Emissions

    California Fire Lawyers File Suit Against PG&E on Behalf of More Than 50 Wildfire Victims

    Five Types of Structural Systems in High Rise Buildings

    The Construction Lawyer as Problem Solver

    Funding the Self-Insured Retention (SIR)

    North Carolina Learns More Lessons From Latest Storm

    How AI and Machine Learning Are Helping Construction Reduce Risk and Improve Margins

    Construction Termination Issues Part 4: What to Do When They Want to Fire You, the Architect or Engineer

    Combating Climate Change by Reducing Embodied Energy in the Built Environment

    Burden of Proof Under All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    ADA Compliance Checklist For Your Business

    Bridges Need More Attention

    Sixth Circuit Rejects Claim for Reverse Bad Faith

    A Court-Side Seat: Guam’s CERCLA Claim Allowed, a “Roundup” Verdict Upheld, and Judicial Process Privilege Lost

    Implications for Industry as Supreme Court Curbs EPA's Authority

    Construction Delayed by Discovery of Bones

    Following California Law, Federal Court Adopts Horizontal Allocation For Asbestos Coverage

    Ontario Court of Appeal Clarifies the Meaning of "Living in the Same Household" for Purposes of Coverage Under a Homeowners Policy

    Texas Legislative Update

    Kahana Feld Named to the Orange County Register 2024 Top Workplaces List

    Lithium for Batteries from Geothermal Brine

    Forget the Apple Watch. Apple’s Next Biggest Thing Isn’t for Sale

    Pay Inequities Are a Symptom of Broader Gender Biases, Studies Show

    Reminder: A Little Pain Now Can Save a Lot of Pain Later

    Federal Public Works Construction Collection Remedies: The Miller Act Payment Bond Claim

    Wisconsin Court Applies the Economic Loss Doctrine to Bar Negligence Claims for Purely Economic Losses

    Reminder: Quantum Meruit and Breach of Construction Contract Don’t Mix

    MapLab: Why More Americans Are Moving Toward Wildfire

    Gordie Howe Bridge Project Team Looks for a Third Period Comeback

    Wildfire Insurance Coverage Series, Part 3: Standard Form Policy Exclusions

    Tetra Tech-U.S. Cleanup Dispute in San Francisco Grows

    What Does It Mean When a House Sells for $50 Million?

    High Court Case Review Frees Jailed Buffalo Billions Contractor CEO

    Construction Litigation Roundup: “Tender Is the Fight”

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Texas Supreme Court to Review Eight-Corners Duty-to-Defend Rule

    Index Demonstrates Increase in Builders’ Sentiment

    Washington Supreme Court Interprets Ensuing Loss Exception in All-Risk Property Insurance Policy

    Court Finds No Occurrence for Installation of Defective flooring and Explains Coverage for Attorney Fee Awards

    Welcome to SubTropolis: The Massive Business Complex Buried Under Kansas City

    KB Home Names New President of its D.C. Metro Division

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a D+

    New California Standards Go into Effect July 1st
    Corporate Profile

    FAIRFIELD CONNECTICUT BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Fairfield, Connecticut Building Expert Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Fairfield, Connecticut

    JPMorgan Blamed for ‘Zombie’ Properties in Miami Lawsuit

    June 18, 2014 —
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) engaged in a “pattern of discriminatory” lending that led to foreclosures, the city of Miami said in a lawsuit filed last week in federal court, the latest in a series of similar claims against the nation’s largest banks. Last month, Banco Santander SA’s (SAN) U.S. unit was sued by the city of Providence, Rhode Island, over claims it stopped issuing mortgages in minority neighborhoods after the housing bubble burst. Santander Bank, previously named Sovereign Bank, pulled out of the neighborhoods and focused on white communities after being acquired by the Madrid-based lender in 2009, the city alleged. Miami and Los Angeles are among cities to have filed similar lawsuits against Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. (C) and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) for allegedly “red-lining” black and Hispanic areas as no-loan zones, and then “reverse red-lining,” flooding the areas with predatory mortgages even when minorities qualified for better terms. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Christie Smythe, Bloomberg
    Ms. Smythe may be contacted at csmythe1@bloomberg.net

    California Supreme Court Declines Request to Expand Exceptions to Privette Doctrine for Known Hazards

    January 17, 2022 —
    First things first. Happy New Year! Hope you had a good one. To start things off in the new year we’ve got an employment-related case for you – Gonzalez v. Mathis, 12 Cal.5th 29 (2021) – a California Supreme Court case involving the Privette Doctrine. For those not familiar with the Privette Doctrine, the Privette Doctrine is named after the case Privette v. Superior Court, 5 Cal.4th 689 (1993), which held that project owners and higher-tiered contractors are not liable for workplace injuries sustained by employees of lower-tiered contractors. Since then, courts have carved out a few exceptions to the Privette Doctrine including the “retained control exception” (also known as the Hooker exception – that’s the name of the case not the occupation of the injured worker) whereby a “hirer,” that is, the higher-tiered party who hired the lower-tiered party whose employee is injured, can be held liable if the hirer: (1) retains control over any part of the lower-tiered party’s work; and (2) negligently exercises that control in a manner that affirmatively contributes to the worker’s injury. Another exception is the “concealed hazard exception” (also known as the Kinsman exception) whereby a hirer can be held liable if: (1) the hirer knew, or should have known, of a concealed hazard on the property that the lower-tiered contractor did not know of and could not have reasonably discovered; and (2) the hirer railed to warn the lower-tiered contractor of that hazard. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Nomos LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@nomosllp.com

    OSHA’s Multi-Employer Citation Policy: What Employers on Construction Sites Need to Know

    September 09, 2019 —
    Multi-employer worksites are a frequent occurrence in the construction industry as employees from various companies often occupy the same site while a project is being completed. While the need for employees from different companies may be necessary to perform the various tasks required by a project, the presence of multiple employers, and their employees, on the same worksite can result in an increased risk of safety hazards. Companies performing construction work should be, and generally are, aware of OSHA’s ability to issue citations for workplace safety violations. What many companies may not know, however, is that OSHA’s ability to cite employers is not limited to workplace conditions that are unsafe only to that employer’s direct employees. Rather, OSHA also has the ability to cite an employer, and often does issue such citations, for conditions that could result in injury or death to another company’s employees. The policy which provides OSHA with this citation ability is CPL 02-00-124 and is called the Multi-Employer Citation Policy (the “Policy”). Under the language of the Policy, OSHA has the ability to cite multiple employers for violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act for the same hazardous workplace condition. Critically, responsibilities under the Policy do not depend on the employer’s job title but are determined by the employer’s role. Reprinted courtesy of Phillip C. Bauknight, Construction Executive, a publication of Associated Builders and Contractors. All rights reserved. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of
    Mr. Bauknight may be contacted at pbauknight@fisherphillips.com

    Confidence Among U.S. Homebuilders Little Changed in January

    January 28, 2015 —
    (Bloomberg) -- Confidence among U.S. homebuilders hovered in January close to a nine-year high, indicating the residential real estate market is poised to expand this year. While the National Association of Home Builders/Wells Fargo builder sentiment gauge fell to 57 this month from 58 in December, readings greater than 50 mean more respondents report good market conditions, according to figures issued from the Washington-based group Tuesday. The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey called for 58. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bloomberg News

    New Home Construction Booming in Texas

    October 24, 2022 —

    With the rapid relocation trends of families moving to Texas, it was reported that new residential construction permits in Texas grew to a total value in excess of $2 billion and over 7,500 new construction permits in September 2022 alone. D.R. Horton lead the way with 1,139 new permits, while Lennar Homes clocked 696 new permits. Other leading homebuilders including KB Homes (239 permits) and Pulte Homes (253 permits) remained active heading into the 4th Quarter of 2022. The following is a breakdown of new permits and average home values in the 4 largest cities in Texas (Houston, Dallas, Austin and San Antonio) for September 2022:

    Houston

    Last month, there were approximately 340 home builders with new permits on record in the Houston area, and the following ranked as the top five total new permits:

    BuilderTotal PermitsAverage Value
    1-D.R. Horton 483 $ 129,812.00
    2-Camillo Properties 190 $ 147,790.00
    3-Lennar Homes 188 $ 195,503.00
    4-Meritage Homes 124 $ 248,597.00
    5-Wan Pacific Real Estate Development 117 $ 165,044.00

    Dallas

    In Dallas, there were more than 290 contractors with new residential construction activity on record with HBW last month, and the following ranked as the top five for total new permits:

    BuilderTotal PermitsAverage Value
    1-D.R. Horton 555 $ 179,430.00
    2-Lennar Homes 232 $ 202,318.00
    3-Trophy Signature Homes 111 $ 274,016.00
    4-Bloomfield Homes 97 $ 405,235.00
    5-Meritage Homes 92 $ 267,425.00

     Austin

    Last month, there were nearly 125 home builders with new construction activity on record in the Austin area, and the following ranked as the top five for total new permits for the one-month period:

    BuilderTotal PermitsAverage Value
    1-Lennar Homes 150 $ 154,390.00
    2-KB Homes 147 $ 253,606.00
    3-D.R. Horton 99 $ 200,416.00
    4-Taylor Morrison Homes 79 $ 365,183.00
    5-David Weekley Homes 64 $ 436,978.00

     San Antonio

    In San Antonio, there were nearly 120 contractors with new residential construction activity on record last month, and the following ranked as the top five for total new permits:

    BuilderTotal PermitsAverage Value
    1-Lennar Homes 126 $ 174,315.00
    2-KB Homes 55 $ 254,109.00
    3-Pulte Homes 52 $ 241,012.00
    4-M/I Homes 51 $ 237,283.00
    5-LGI Homes 30 $ 202,760.00

    The residential construction boom is Texas does not appear to be slowing down anytime soon. With new corporations relocating corporate offices to the Lone Star State each year, we expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable future. And with increased home production, we will closely monitor the increase in construction related litigation over the next five to ten years.

    The increase in market activity attracts new or inexperienced builders and tradesman, making the importance of a proactive approach to construction management all the more important. Given the labor shortages and supply chain issues. It is imperative that Texas homebuilders take extra precautions to ensure quality construction practices and oversight to minimize potential litigation.

    Reprinted courtesy of Jason Daniel Feld, Kahana Feld and Ron Raydon, Kahana Feld

    Mr. Feld may be contacted at jfeld@kahanafeld.com

    Mr. Raydon may be contacted at rraydon@kahanafeld.com

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Commerce City Enacts Reform to Increase For-Sale Multifamily Housing

    August 19, 2015 —
    Many cities in Denver’s metropolitan areas are experiencing tremendous growth. For more than a year, Colorado has been reported to be in a building boom. However even with the noticeable expansion, some areas still suffer from a lack of housing options specific to multifamily developments. Sean Ford, Mayor of Commerce City, stated that “[the city] has not approved a new condominium or multi-family project since 2008.”[1] Those of us in the construction industry attribute this shortage, at least in part, to construction defect litigation, which is often drawn-out, complicated, and very costly to builders. Predicting that light rail service will intensify the need for owner-occupied units among Commerce City residents, the city council enacted legislation to address this scarcity. Ordinance No. 2060 which took effect August 1, 2015 provides “reasonable steps to encourage prompt and voluntary correction of construction defects … in order to enhance the health and safety of residents of Commerce City.” The ordinance requires a homeowner who discovers a defect to provide written notice via certified mail or personal delivery to the responsible builder, contractor, engineer, or design professional. The notice may include requests for relevant construction documentation, maintenance recommendations, and warranty information. The builder must acknowledge receipt of notice and provide requested documents within 14 days. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David M. McLain, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. McLain may be contacted at mclain@hhmrlaw.com

    VOSH Jumps Into the Employee Misclassification Pool

    February 23, 2016 —
    The proper classification of workers by construction companies has been on the radar of the Department of Labor for both the US and Virginia governments for quite a while. While most of the misclassification is innocent and not done to create issues, there have been enough instances of purposeful misclassification of certain workers as independent contractors (thus avoiding workers comp and other payroll expenses) that innocent contractors have born the brunt of these issues through increased payroll costs over those that misclassify (in the form of necessarily higher bids, higher overhead, etc.). As an additional deterrent to improper classification of workers, the Virginia Department of Labor and Industry has issued guidelines for what will occur in Virginia Department of Safety and Health (VOSH) cases. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Christopher G. Hill, Law Office of Christopher G. Hill, PC
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    Nevada Senate Rejects Construction Defect Bill

    June 07, 2011 —

    The Las Vegas Sun reports that Assembly Bill 401, the construction defect bill, lost in a vote of 9 to 12. The measure extended the time for construction defect suits to be filed, awarded legal costs only to successful plaintiffs, and set a definition of construction defects. Two Democrats joined the Republicans in the Senate in defeating the bill.

    Read the full story…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of