BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    office building building expert Columbus Ohio retail construction building expert Columbus Ohio mid-rise construction building expert Columbus Ohio hospital construction building expert Columbus Ohio housing building expert Columbus Ohio structural steel construction building expert Columbus Ohio tract home building expert Columbus Ohio condominiums building expert Columbus Ohio landscaping construction building expert Columbus Ohio Medical building building expert Columbus Ohio casino resort building expert Columbus Ohio production housing building expert Columbus Ohio institutional building building expert Columbus Ohio multi family housing building expert Columbus Ohio high-rise construction building expert Columbus Ohio custom homes building expert Columbus Ohio low-income housing building expert Columbus Ohio condominium building expert Columbus Ohio concrete tilt-up building expert Columbus Ohio parking structure building expert Columbus Ohio industrial building building expert Columbus Ohio Subterranean parking building expert Columbus Ohio
    Columbus Ohio construction expert witnessColumbus Ohio construction expert witnessesColumbus Ohio architectural expert witnessColumbus Ohio construction code expert witnessColumbus Ohio construction expert testimonyColumbus Ohio fenestration expert witnessColumbus Ohio expert witness structural engineer
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Columbus, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Columbus Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Buckeye Valley Building Industry Association
    Local # 3654
    12 W Main St
    Newark, OH 43055

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Central Ohio
    Local # 3627
    495 Executive Campus Drive
    Westerville, OH 43082

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Miami County
    Local # 3682
    1200 Archer Dr
    Troy, OH 45373

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Ohio Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 3600
    17 S High Street Ste 700
    Columbus, OH 43215

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Union County Chapter
    Local # 3684
    PO Box 525
    Marysville, OH 43040

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Shelby County Builders Association
    Local # 3670
    PO Box 534
    Sidney, OH 45365

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Columbus Ohio


    Construction Company Head Pleads Guilty to Insurance and Tax Fraud

    What are Section 8(f) Agreements?

    How to Prepare for Potential Construction Disputes Resulting From COVID-19

    #7 CDJ Topic: Truck Ins. Exchange v. O'Mailia

    Contractors: Consult Your Insurance Broker Regarding Your CGL Policy

    Building Supplier Sued for Late and Defective Building Materials

    The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict on the Insurance Industry, Part One: Coverage, Exposure, and Losses

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    Court of Appeals Discusses Implied Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Public Works Contracting

    Construction is the Fastest Growing Industry in California

    Creating a Custom Home Feature in the Great Outdoors

    Think Twice About Depreciating Repair Costs in Our State, says the Tennessee Supreme Court

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized in 2019 Edition of Who’s Who Legal

    America’s Infrastructure Gets a C-. It’s an Improvement Though

    Wood Wizardry in Oregon: Innovation Raises the Roof for PDX Terminal

    Indemnity Provision Provides Relief to Contractor; Additional Insured Provision Does Not

    Drone Use On Construction Projects

    San Francisco Office Secures Defense Verdict in Legal Malpractice Action

    World’s Biggest Crane Gets to Work at British Nuclear Plant

    Claims for Negligence? Duty to Defend Triggered

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/11/23) – Millennials Struggle Finding Homes, Additional CHIPS Act Funding Available, and the Supreme Court Takes up Hotel Lawsuit Case

    Counterpoint: Washington Supreme Court to Rule on Resulting Losses in Insurance Disputes

    Three Reasons Lean Construction Principles Are Still Valid

    California Court of Appeals Says, “We Like Eich(leay)!”

    Replacing Coal Plants with Renewables Is Cheaper 80% of the Time

    Supreme Court of Washington State Upholds SFAA Position on Spearin Doctrine

    Construction Contract Clauses That May or May Not Have Your Vote – Part 3

    Preliminary Notice Is More Important Than Ever During COVID-19

    Appreciate The Risks You Are Assuming In Your Contract

    Nevada’s Construction Defect Law

    A Look at Business and Professions Code Section 7031

    Investigation of Orange County Landslide

    Federal Court Ruling Bolsters the “Your Work” Exclusion in Standard CGL Policies

    Court Strikes Down Reasonable Construction Defect Settlement

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (10/1/24) – Hybrid Work Technologies, AI in Construction and the Market for Office Buildings

    Data Is Critical for the Future of Construction

    Brookfield Wins Disputed Bid to Manage Manhattan Marina

    Dave McLain named Barrister’s Best Construction Defects Lawyer for Defendants for 2019

    New York Developer’s Alleged Court Judgment Woes

    Protecting and Perfecting Your Mechanics Lien when the Property Owner Files Bankruptcy

    The Privette Doctrine, the Hooker Exception, and an Attack at a Construction Site

    Wes Payne Receives Defense Attorney of the Year Award

    Colorado Passes Construction Defect Reform Bill

    Lead Paint: The EPA’s Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule

    Quick Note: Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond

    Construction Client Advisory: The Power of the Bonded Stop Notice Extends to Expended Construction Funds

    Builders Can’t Rely on SB800

    The Reptile Theory in Practice

    Arizona Purchaser Dwelling Actions Are Subject to a New Construction

    EPA and the Corps of Engineers Repeal the 2015 “Waters of the United States” Rule
    Corporate Profile

    COLUMBUS OHIO BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Columbus, Ohio Building Expert Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from more than 25 years experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Columbus, Ohio

    DC Wins Largest-Ever Civil Penalty in US Housing Discrimination Suit

    November 15, 2022 —
    Three real estate companies operating in Washington, DC, will pay record-breaking penalties in a suit brought by the city for illegally discriminating against tenants who use Section 8 vouchers and other forms of housing assistance. The attorney general for the District of Columbia, Karl Racine, announced on Thursday a settlement for $10 million. While fair housing cases involving lenders have resulted in larger compensation payouts, $10 million is the largest civil penalty ever levied in a housing discrimination case. In 2020, the city sued several entities — DARO Management Services, DARO Realty and New York-based parent company Infinity Real Estate, as well as several executives — over housing practices in the District. DARO Management operates and rents some 1,200 residential units in more than a dozen apartment buildings spread across Wards 1, 2 and 3, which include DC’s more affluent areas. (DARO Realty owns the properties, DARO Management operates them, and Infinity owns both affiliates.) Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kriston Capps, Bloomberg

    Sixth Circuit Holds that Some Official Actions Taken in the “Flint Water Crisis” Could Be Constitutional Due Process Violations

    March 27, 2019 —
    In what the Court of Appeals describes as “the infamous government-created environmental disaster known at the Flint Water Crisis,” a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled that some of the government personnel responsible for this disaster may be liable, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for monetary damages based on the Substantive Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. The case is Guertin, et al., v. State of Michigan, et al., decided on January 4, 2019. On April 25, 2014, the City of Flint, MI, facing a financial crisis, agreed to switch its drinking water supply from the water provided by the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department to untreated water available from the Flint River that would be treated in the waterworks owned and operated by the City. However, the City waterworks could not provide the needed treatment, which resulted in the corrosive Flint River water leaching lead out of the old Flint water pipes. Soon thereafter, a public health and environmental crisis enveloped Flint. Many lawsuits have been filed against many defendants, and many civil and criminal investigations have been opened. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com

    Weyerhaeuser Leaving Home Building Business

    November 13, 2013 —
    The Washington-based timber giant, Weyerhaeuser, has announced that has sold off its homebuilding business. The division went by the name of WRECO (Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company) and comprised five home builders, Maracay Homes, Pardee Homes, Quadrant Homes, Trendmaker Homes, and Winchester Homes. The division was bought by TRI Pointe Homes for about $2.7 billion of which $700 million was paid in cash. Weyerhaeuser intends to focus on their core business of timber products. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Granting Stay, Federal Court Reviews Construction Defect Coverage in Hawaii

    January 06, 2012 —

    The federal district court ultimately stayed a construction defect case, but offered comments on the current status of coverage disputes for such defects in Hawaii. See National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. Simpson Mfg. Co., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 128481(D. Haw. Nov. 7, 2011).

    National Union filed a complaint for declaratory relief to establish it had no duty to defend or to indemnify Simpson Manufacturing Company in four actions pending in the Hawaii state courts. The state court actions concerned allegedly defective hurricane strap tie hold downs that were manufactured and sold by Simpson. The hurricane ties allegedly began to prematurely corrode and rust, causing cracking, spalling and other damage to homes.

    National Union contended the underlying allegations did not constitute "property damage" caused by an "occurrence," as defined in the policies.

    Read the full story…

    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii. Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Construction Defect Claim not Barred by Prior Arbitration

    October 28, 2015 —
    According to Stan Martin of Commonsense Construction Law LLC, the Appellate Court of Connecticut ruled in favor of the owner of a twenty-two building development in a construction defect suit despite the contractor’s objection “that the lawsuit was barred by doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel.” When issues of “construction and alleged defects” arose in 1996, the “contractor eventually filed for arbitration, seeking the contract balance.” The contractor was awarded $82,812.81. During the arbitration, “no claims for defective construction were advanced.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Crane Dangles and So Do Insurance Questions

    November 07, 2012 —
    Hurricane Sandy sent a construction crane dangling from the top of One57, a condo construction project in New York City. In response to the risk, the nearby Parker Meridian and other nearby buildings were evacuated until the crane could be stabilized. Businessweek reports that One57 involves “a tangle of companies,” including the developer, Extell Development and the contractor, Lend Lease Construction. Pinnacle Industries was responsible for providing and operating the crane. The insurance claims are yet to be made, but they will likely include the costs of evacuating nearby buildings and to cover any damage to the building itself. David DeLaRue, a vice president in construction practice at Willis Group Holdings said there would be two questions: “Did our insured do anything to cause that loss? Does this policy cover it?” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP Expands into Georgia

    November 03, 2016 —
    Wood Smith Henning & Berman LLP (WSHB) has opened a new regional office in Atlanta, Georgia. Richard E. Zelonka, Jr., will be the Managing Partner. With over a decade of trial experience, Mr. Zelonka has handled complex litigation in both state and federal courts throughout the Southeastern United States. “I am thrilled to be joining Wood Smith Henning & Berman. WSHB’s sterling reputation, coupled with its national footprint, is especially attractive. That, coupled with the Firm’s passionate dedication to their clients, made this move a very easy choice for me,” said Mr. Zelonka. “I could not be more excited to lead WSHB’s new Georgia office.” The Firm’s Atlanta office is located at 1170 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 1200, Atlanta, Georgia 30309. The main phone number is (404) 885-5700. The fax number is (404) 506-9108. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Benefits to Insureds Under Property Insurance Policy – Concurrent Cause Doctrine

    December 08, 2016 —
    The Florida Supreme Court in Sebo v. American Home Assurance Co., Inc., 41 Fla. L. Weekly S582a (Fla. 2016) gave really good news to claimants seeking recovery under a first-party all-risk property insurance policy. The Court held that the concurrent cause doctrine and not the efficient proximate cause doctrine was the proper theory of recovery to apply when multiple perils—an excluded peril and a covered peril-combined to create a property loss. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Katz, Barron, Squitero, Faust, Friedberg, English & Allen, P.A.
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dma@katzbarron.com