BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    casino resort building expert Columbus Ohio hospital construction building expert Columbus Ohio institutional building building expert Columbus Ohio housing building expert Columbus Ohio condominiums building expert Columbus Ohio low-income housing building expert Columbus Ohio mid-rise construction building expert Columbus Ohio parking structure building expert Columbus Ohio multi family housing building expert Columbus Ohio production housing building expert Columbus Ohio industrial building building expert Columbus Ohio tract home building expert Columbus Ohio custom home building expert Columbus Ohio Subterranean parking building expert Columbus Ohio townhome construction building expert Columbus Ohio concrete tilt-up building expert Columbus Ohio Medical building building expert Columbus Ohio structural steel construction building expert Columbus Ohio retail construction building expert Columbus Ohio condominium building expert Columbus Ohio office building building expert Columbus Ohio high-rise construction building expert Columbus Ohio
    Columbus Ohio construction expert witnessesColumbus Ohio consulting engineersColumbus Ohio construction claims expert witnessColumbus Ohio construction code expert witnessColumbus Ohio structural engineering expert witnessesColumbus Ohio architect expert witnessColumbus Ohio ada design expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Columbus, Ohio

    Ohio Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: According to HB 175, Chptr 1312, for a homebuilder to qualify for right to repair protection, the contractor must notify consumers (in writing) of NOR laws at the time of sale; The law stipulates written notice of defects required itemizing and describing and including documentation prepared by inspector. A contractor has 21 days to respond in writing.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Columbus Ohio

    Licensing is done at the local level. Licenses required for plumbing, electrical, HVAC, heating, and hydronics trades.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Buckeye Valley Building Industry Association
    Local # 3654
    12 W Main St
    Newark, OH 43055

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Central Ohio
    Local # 3627
    495 Executive Campus Drive
    Westerville, OH 43082

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Miami County
    Local # 3682
    1200 Archer Dr
    Troy, OH 45373

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Ohio Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 3600
    17 S High Street Ste 700
    Columbus, OH 43215

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Union County Chapter
    Local # 3684
    PO Box 525
    Marysville, OH 43040

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Clark County Chapter
    Local # 3673
    PO Box 1047
    Springfield, OH 45501

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10

    Shelby County Builders Association
    Local # 3670
    PO Box 534
    Sidney, OH 45365

    Columbus Ohio Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Columbus Ohio


    China Bans Tallest Skyscrapers Following Safety Concerns

    North Carolina Court Rules In Favor Of All Sums

    In Real Life the Bad Guy Sometimes Gets Away: Adding Judgment Debtors to a Judgment

    Hawaii Federal District Rejects Another Construction Defect Claim

    Scarce Cemetery Space Creates Prices to Die For: Cities

    Tension Over Municipal Gas Bans Creates Uncertainty for Real Estate Developers

    A Year After Fatal Genoa Viaduct Collapse, Replacement Takes Shape

    Toll Brothers Snags Home Builder of the Year Honors at HLS

    A Court-Side Seat: Waters, Walls and Pipelines

    Who Would Face Liability For Oroville Dam Management: Brett Moore Authors Law360 Article

    U.K. Puts Tax on Developers to Fund Safer Apartment Blocks

    Admissibility of Expert Opinions in Insurance Bad Faith Trials

    Does the Implied Warranty of Habitability Extend to Subsequent Purchasers? Depends on the State

    When Every Drop Matters, Cities Turn to Watertech

    White and Williams Celebrates Chambers 2024 Rankings

    Breach of Contract Exclusion Bars Coverage for Construction Defect Claim

    More Charges Anticipated in Las Vegas HOA Scam

    Axa Buys London Pinnacle Site for Redesigned Skyscraper

    When Coronavirus Cases Spike at Construction Jobsites

    Haight Welcomes New Attorneys to Los Angeles, Sacramento and San Francisco

    Nomos LLP Partner Garret Murai Recognized by Super Lawyers

    "On Second Thought"

    Californians Swarm Few Listings Cuts to Affordable Homes

    North Carolina Soil & Groundwater Case to be Heard by U.S. Supreme Court

    Just Because You Allege There Was an Oral Contract Doesn’t Mean You’re Off the Hook for Attorneys’ Fees if you Lose

    Real Estate & Construction News Round-Up 05/04/22

    Homeowner Sues Brick Manufacturer for Spalling Bricks

    Allen, TX Board of Trustees Expected to Approve Stadium Repair Plans

    Indemnification Provisions Do Not Create Reciprocal Attorney’s Fees Provisions

    Federal Subcontractor Who Failed to Follow FAR Regulations Finds That “Fair” and “Just” are Not Synonymous

    Should a Subcontractor provide bonds to a GC who is not himself bonded? (Bonding Agent Perspective)

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    Plans Go High Tech

    At Least 23 Dead as Tornadoes, Severe Storms Ravage South

    North Dakota Court Determines Inadvertent Faulty Workmanship is an "Occurrence"

    Governmental Action Exclusion Bars Claim for Damage to Insured's Building

    Real Estate & Construction News Roundup (08/15/23) – Manufacturing Soars with CHIPS Act, New Threats to U.S. Infrastructure and AI Innovation for One Company

    Engineering Report Finds More Investigation Needed of Balconies at New Jersey Condo

    Noncumulation Clause Limits Coverage to One Occurrence

    FEMA Offers to Review Hurricane Sandy Claims

    Microsoft Urges the Construction Industry to Deliver Lifecycle Value

    Hail Drives Construction Spending in Amarillo

    Sureties and Bond Producers May Be Liable For a Contractor’s False Claims Action Violation

    Cumulative Impact Claims and Definition by Certain Boards

    COVID-19 Pandemic Preference Amendments to Bankruptcy Code Benefiting Vendors, Customers, Commercial Landlords and Tenants

    N.J. Appellate Court Confirms that AIA Construction Contract Bars Insurer's Subrogation Claim

    Subcontractor Strikes Out in its Claims Against Federal Government

    Mediation Scheduled for Singer's Construction Defect Claims

    The Ghosts of Projects Past

    EPA Can't Evade Enviro Firm's $2.7M Cleanup Site Pay Claim, US Court Says
    Corporate Profile

    COLUMBUS OHIO BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Columbus, Ohio Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Columbus' most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Columbus, Ohio

    WA Supreme Court Allows Property Owner to Sue Engineering Firm for Lost Profits

    February 25, 2014 —
    In the Daily Journal of Commerce, Scott A. Smith and James H. Wendell discussed the recent Washington Supreme Court decision in Donatelli v D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers. The court’s ruling casts “doubt on a company's ability to limit its liability for economic losses arising out of a contract dispute.” The Donatellis hired D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers to develop vacant land in King County, however, the “project did not go according to plan and the real estate market collapsed before the project was completed,” according to the Daily Journal of Commerce. The “Donatellis lost their property through foreclosure” and then “sued the engineering firm for more than $1.5 million in lost profits.” D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers asked for the negligence claims to be dismissed “because the parties' contract contained a provision limiting the engineering firm's liability to the amount of its fee for ‘any injury or loss on account of any error, omission, or other professional negligence.’” However, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that “the case could proceed in the trial court on a theory that the engineers could be liable if they made negligent misrepresentations that induced the Donatellis to enter into the contract in the first place.” Smith and Wendell stated that because of “this decision, engineering, architectural, construction, and other professional service companies may now face damage claims they thought they were contractually protected against.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Index Demonstrates Increase in Builders’ Sentiment

    September 17, 2014 —
    The National Association of Home Builders’ Eye on Housing reported that “[b]uilders’ sentiment jumped four points to 59, the highest level since November 2005, according to the September NAHB/Wells Fargo Housing Market Index.” Furthermore, builders mentioned “renewed interest by potential home buyers and higher traffic in their models and through their phone calls.” Eye on Housing also reported that the “inventory of new home for sale has increased to over 200,000.” While still lower than the 300,000 typical in 1990s and early 2000s, “the steady increase has provided a better selection for consumers.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Equipment Costs? It’s a Steal!

    July 08, 2011 —

    KCBD reports on the problems of a Lubbock, Texas contractor. It’s hard to do the job when your tools keep getting stolen. Corey Meadows, owner of Top Cut Interiors, told KCBD that he had chained an air compressor to a table saw. Since the thieves couldn’t cut the chain, they cut the table saw “and just took the air compressor and the chain.” Meadows estimates the thieves cost him $2,000 in damaged or stolen equipment and time lost.

    Read the full story…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Bill to Include Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Introduced in New Jersey

    December 04, 2013 —
    On November 25, Gary S. Schaer, a Democrat from Bergen and Passic, introduced a bill into the New Jersey legislature that would require insurers to cover faulty workmanship. The bill would require commercial liability insurance policies to cover “property damage or bodily injury resulting from faulty workmanship.” Policies that do not provide this coverage could not be offered in the state of New Jersey should the measure pass and be enacted into law. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Crime Lab Beset by Ventilation Issues

    January 29, 2014 —
    A new crime lab in Clayton county, Missouri, is beset with “’hurricane-like’ gales and persistent dripping water that officials say threatened to contaminate key evidence from crimes,” reported the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. St. Louis County Police Chief Tim Fitch admitted that he didn’t believe any evidence has been destroyed yet, but we’re “talking about highly sensitive evidence from homicide scenes that we must assure is not being contaminated by leakage or other means.” According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, the “general contractor and public works official insist the problems—and extreme temperature differences among rooms—were glitches expected in any major project, and are being fixed.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Traub Lieberman Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian Obtain Dismissal with Prejudice in Favor of Defendant

    November 27, 2023 —
    In a 14-count breach of contract action brought in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida, Partner Michael K. Kiernan and Associate Brandon Christian obtained dismissal with prejudice in favor of Defendant St. Joseph’s Episcopal Church of Boynton Beach, Florida (“Church”). Plaintiffs, St. Joseph’s Episcopal School (“School”) and its benefactor, William Swaney, filed suit to enforce an alleged 99-year oral lease agreement which Swaney asserted had been made to him by a prior rector of the Church in exchange for his contributions to the School. Plaintiffs also sought emergency injunctive relief to allow the School to continue to operate on Church property. The Church maintained in part that the only lease in effect was a written lease, approved by the Church Vestry and the Diocese of Southeast Florida, and which the Church Vestry unanimously voted not to renew in 2022. Reprinted courtesy of Michael K. Kiernan, Traub Lieberman and Brandon Christian, Traub Lieberman Mr. Kiernan may be contacted at mkiernan@tlsslaw.com Mr. Christian may be contacted at bchristian@tlsslaw.com Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    California Supreme Court Rejects Third Exception to Privette Doctrine

    July 03, 2022 —
    Walnut Creek, Calif. (May 25, 2022) - In Gonzalez v. Mathis (August 19, 2021) 12 Cal. 5th 29, the California Supreme Court considered whether to create a third exception to the Privette Doctrine specific to known hazards on a worksite, when a contractor cannot remedy the hazard by taking reasonable safety precautions to protect against it. Privette Background Under the Privette Doctrine, the hirer of an independent contractor generally cannot be liable for injuries sustained by the independent contractor or its employees while on the job. This is due to the “strong presumption” that the hirer delegates all responsibility for workplace safety to the independent contractor. See Privette v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal. 4th 689. Since the Privette ruling in 1993, the California Supreme Court has identified two circumstances in which the presumption may be overcome. First, the hirer may be liable when it retains control over any part of the independent contractor’s work and negligently exercises that retained control in a manner that affirmatively contributes to the injury. Hooker v. Dept. of Transportation (2002) 27 Cal. 4th 198, 213. Second, a landowner who hires an independent contractor may be liable if the landowner knew, or should have known, of a concealed hazard to the property that the contractor did not know of and could not have reasonably discovered, and the landowner failed to warn the contractor of the hazard. Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2005) 37 Cal. 4th 659, 664. Here, in the Gonzalez case, the court considered whether a landowner could be liable for known hazards on the property. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Lewis Brisbois

    Contractors Board May Discipline Over Workers’ Comp Reporting

    November 06, 2013 —
    California recently passed AB 1794, which authorized the Employment Development Department to share information it received on new hires with other agencies. The bill also allows the Contractors State License Board to audit members based on this information to determine if contractors are engaging in workers’ compensation fraud. Writing on the Cumming & White construction litigation blog, Iman Reza notes that “the new law is intended to deter contractors from cutting corners in underreporting employees.” The CSLB will be able to discipline contractors who seek to gain an illegitimate competitive advantage by circumventing the law. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of