BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up building expert Seattle Washington housing building expert Seattle Washington structural steel construction building expert Seattle Washington custom homes building expert Seattle Washington Medical building building expert Seattle Washington tract home building expert Seattle Washington mid-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington hospital construction building expert Seattle Washington multi family housing building expert Seattle Washington retail construction building expert Seattle Washington high-rise construction building expert Seattle Washington production housing building expert Seattle Washington townhome construction building expert Seattle Washington office building building expert Seattle Washington low-income housing building expert Seattle Washington institutional building building expert Seattle Washington landscaping construction building expert Seattle Washington casino resort building expert Seattle Washington condominiums building expert Seattle Washington industrial building building expert Seattle Washington condominium building expert Seattle Washington parking structure building expert Seattle Washington
    Seattle Washington roofing construction expertSeattle Washington expert witness concrete failureSeattle Washington window expert witnessSeattle Washington construction code expert witnessSeattle Washington construction defect expert witnessSeattle Washington eifs expert witnessSeattle Washington construction expert witnesses
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Seattle, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Seattle Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    MBuilders Association of King & Snohomish Counties
    Local # 4955
    335 116th Ave SE
    Bellevue, WA 98004

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kitsap County
    Local # 4944
    5251 Auto Ctr Way
    Bremerton, WA 98312

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Spokane
    Local # 4966
    5813 E 4th Ave Ste 201
    Spokane, WA 99212

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of North Central
    Local # 4957
    PO Box 2065
    Wenatchee, WA 98801

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    MBuilders Association of Pierce County
    Local # 4977
    PO Box 1913 Suite 301
    Tacoma, WA 98401

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    North Peninsula Builders Association
    Local # 4927
    PO Box 748
    Port Angeles, WA 98362
    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Jefferson County Home Builders Association
    Local # 4947
    PO Box 1399
    Port Hadlock, WA 98339

    Seattle Washington Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Seattle Washington


    Cherokee Nation Wins Summary Judgment in COVID-19 Business Interruption Claim

    When Do Hard-Nosed Negotiations Become Coercion? Or, When Should You Feel Unlucky?

    Re-Entering the Workplace: California's Guideline for Employers

    Insured Under Property Insurance Policy Should Comply With Post-Loss Policy Conditions

    Fence Attached to Building Covered Under Dwelling Provisions

    Melissa Dewey Brumback Invited Into Claims & Litigation Management Alliance Membership

    Brown and Caldwell Appoints Stigers as Design Chief Engineer

    How to Lose Your Contractor’s License in 90 Days (or Less): California and Louisiana

    #5 CDJ Topic: David Belasco v. Gary Loren Wells et al. (2015) B254525

    The COVID-19 Impact: Navigating the Legal Landscape’s New Normal

    Developer Boymelgreen Forced to Hand Over Financial Records for 15 Broad Street

    Even Where Fraud and Contract Mix, Be Careful With Timing

    Combating Climate Change by Reducing Embodied Energy in the Built Environment

    Illinois Non-Profit Sues over Defective Roof

    Colorado General Assembly Sets Forth Prerequisites for an Insurance Company to Use Failure to Cooperate as a Defense to a Claim for First Party Insurance Benefits

    Unlicensed Contractors Caught in a Sting Operation

    Do We Really Want Courts Deciding if Our Construction Contracts are Fair?

    Do Engineers Owe a Duty to Third Parties?

    So a Lawsuit Is on the Horizon…

    Coverage For Advertising Injury Barred by Prior Publication Exclusion

    Extreme Weather Events Show Why the Construction Supply Chain Needs a Risk-Management Transformation

    Home insurance perks for green-friendly design (guest post)

    Two Architecturally Prized Buildings May be Demolished

    Charges in Kansas Water Park Death

    Colorado Supreme Court Weighs in on Timeliness of Claims Against Subcontractors in Construction Defect Actions

    Terminating Notice of Commencement Without Contractor’s Final Payment Affidavit

    Nevada Supreme Court Holds That Insureds Can Use Extrinsic Evidence to Prove Duty to Defend

    Flint Water Crisis and America’s Clean Water Access Failings

    Construction Job Opening Rise in October

    Oregon Supreme Court Confirms Broad Duty to Defend

    A Court-Side Seat – Case Law Update (February 2022)

    Quick Note: Expert Testimony – Back to the Frye Test in Florida

    Construction-Industry Clients Need Well-Reasoned and Clear Policies on Recording Zoom and Teams Meetings

    Loss Ensuing from Faulty Workmanship Covered

    Construction Attorneys Tell DBR that Business is on the Rise

    There's No Place Like Home

    School District Settles Over Defective Athletic Field

    Drastic Rebuild Resurrects Graves' Landmark Portland Building

    The Future of Construction Defects in Utah Unclear

    Arbitration Denied: Third Appellate District Holds Arbitration Clause Procedurally and Substantively Unconscionable

    Wildfire Risk Harms California Home Values, San Francisco Fed Study Finds

    Sixth Circuit Lifts Stay on OSHA’s COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Standards. Supreme Court to Review

    Is Arbitration Final and Binding?

    Fire Raging North of Los Angeles Is Getting Fuel From Dry Winds

    Reminder: Know Your Contractor Licensing Rules

    Will Maryland Beltway Developer's Exit Doom $7.6B P3 Project?

    The Coronavirus, Zoom Meetings and Now a CCPA Class Action

    Insured's Motion for Reconsideration on Protecting the Integrity of Referral Sources under Florida Statute s. 542.335

    Renovation Contractors: Be Careful How You Disclose Your Projects

    Insurance Companies Score Win at Supreme Court
    Corporate Profile

    SEATTLE WASHINGTON BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Seattle, Washington Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 7,000 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Seattle's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Seattle, Washington

    Homebuilders Go Green in Response to Homebuyer Demand

    May 10, 2012 —

    McGrawHill Construction reports that 17 percent of new homes and remodels in 2011 were done with green building practices. Their report estimates that by 2016, this will rise to 29 to 38 percent of the market for home construction and remodeling.

    Consumers see the green buildings as more desirable, particularly where they are more energy efficient. Two thirds of builders noted their customers were interested in features that would lower the energy use of their homes. Consumers also feel that green building materials are more durable and see green homes as higher quality.

    Read the full story…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Congratulations 2022 DE, MA, NJ, NY and PA Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

    August 03, 2022 —

    Twelve White and Williams lawyers have been named by Super Lawyers as a Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York or Pennsylvania "Super Lawyer" while eleven received "Rising Star" designations. Lawyers are selected through a process that takes into consideration peer recognition and professional achievement. The lawyers named to this year’s list represent a multitude of practices throughout the firm.

    Super Lawyers 2022

    AttorneyPractice Area
    John Balaguer PI Defense: Med Mal
    David Chaffin Business Litigation
    Eric Hermanson Insurance Coverage
    Michael Kassak General Litigation
    Bridget La Rosa Estate Planning and Probate
    Randy Maniloff Insurance Coverage
    David Marion Business Litigation
    Wesley Payne Insurance Coverage
    Patricia Santelle Insurance Coverage
    Jay Shapiro Criminal Defense: White Collar
    Heidi Sorvino Bankruptcy: Business
    Andrew Susko Civil Litigation: Defense
    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP

    Greystone on Remand Denies Insurer's Motion for Summary Judgment To Bar Coverage For Construction Defects

    June 28, 2013 —
    A prior post here discussed the Tenth Circuit's decision in Greystone Constr., Inc. v. National Union Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 661 F. 3d 1272 (10th Cir. 2011). The court found a duty to defend construction defect claims where damage caused by the faulty workmanship was unintentional. The Tenth Circuit remanded for a determination on whether any policy exclusions precluded a defense or indemnity for damage arising from faulty workmanship. On remand, the district court denied National Union's Motion for Summary Judgment, seeking to establish the policy exclusions precluded its duty to defend and to indemnify. See Greystone Constr., Inc. v. v. National Union Fire & Marine ins. Co., 2013 U. S. LEXIS 46707 (D. Colo. March 31, 2013). Greystone was sued for construction defects in homes it built. The suit alleged that Greystone failed to recognize defects in the soil where the house was built. National Union refused to defend. The district court initially granted summary judgment to National Union because claims arising from construction defects were not covered. As noted above, the Tenth Circuit vacated because the damage in the underlying suit did not categorically fall outside coverage under the policy. On remand, National Union first argued there was no duty to defend based upon an exclusion precluding coverage for damage arising out of work done by subcontractors unless the subcontractors agreed in writing to defend and indemnify the insured and carried insurance with coverage limits equal to or greater than that carried by the insured. The Tenth Circuit rejected this argument because National Union had to rely on facts outside of the underlying complaint. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred Eyerly
    Tred Eyerly can be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Exculpatory Provisions in Business Contracts

    May 30, 2018 —
    An exculpatory provision in a contract is a provision that relieves one party from liability for damages. It shifts the risk of an issue entirely to the other party. Such a provision is generally drafted by the party preparing the contract that is looking to eliminate or disclaim liability associated with a particular risk, oftentimes a risk within their control. These provisions are also known as limitation of liability provisions because they do exactly that — limit liability as to a risk. For this reason, they can be useful provisions based on the context of certain risks, and are provisions that are included in business contracts (such as construction contracts). While such clauses are disfavored, they are enforceable if they are drafted clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally. If they are unclear, ambiguous, or equivocal, they will construed against enforcement. See Obsessions In Time, Inc. v. Jewelry Exchange Venture, LLP, 43 Fla.L.Weekly D1033a (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (finding exculpatory clause in lease ambiguous and, therefore, unenforceable as to lessor looking to benefit from the exculpatory clause). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David Adelstein, Florida Construction Legal Updates
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at dadelstein@gmail.com

    New Addition to the ASCE/SEI 7-22 Standard Protects Buildings from a 500-year Flood Event

    June 05, 2023 —
    Reston, VA — The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) released a new update to their most widely used standard today, ASCE/SEI 7-22 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Building and Other Structures. As the increasing frequency of severe storms puts strain on communities across the globe, the design standard's new flood load provisions will protect against 500-year flood events, which is a significant improvement to the 100-year flood hazard referenced in the previous version. The update — which is available in a supplement as a free download — is a significant revision of the design provisions in Chapter 5 to strengthen building resilience against the flood hazard. The ASCE 7 national loading standard is an integral part of building codes in the United States and around the globe. "For more than 30 years, the ASCE 7 standard has been the authoritative source for the specification of minimum design loads and related criteria in the civil engineering community," said Tom Smith, ASCE Executive Director. "To ensure structures continue to be safe for the public, it is imperative that the standards we rely on are updated to account for emerging risks to the built environment. This Supplement is the most significant change to the standard's flood load provisions since the inception of ASCE 7 and will improve the safety and reliability of structures across the globe." ABOUT THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS Founded in 1852, the American Society of Civil Engineers represents more than 150,000 civil engineers worldwide and is America's oldest national engineering society. ASCE works to raise awareness of the need to maintain and modernize the nation's infrastructure using sustainable and resilient practices, advocates for increasing and optimizing investment in infrastructure, and improve engineering knowledge and competency. For more information, visit www.asce.org or www.infrastructurereportcard.org and follow us on Twitter, @ASCETweets and @ASCEGovRel. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    The Economic Loss Rule and the Disclosure of Latent Defects: In re the Estate of Carol S. Gattis

    January 15, 2014 —
    In a recent case of first impression, the Colorado Court of Appeals determined that the economic loss rule does not bar a nondisclosure tort claim against a seller of a home, built on expansive soils which caused damage to the house after the sale. The case of In re the Estate of Carol S. Gattis represents a new decision regarding the economic loss rule. Because it is a case of first impression, we must wait to see whether the Colorado Supreme Court grants a petition for certiorari. Until then, we will analyze the decision handed down on November 7, 2013. The sellers of the home sold it to an entity they controlled for the purpose of repairing and reselling the home. Before that purchase, Sellers obtained engineering reports including discussion of structural problems resulting from expansive soils. A structural repair entity, also controlled by Sellers, oversaw the needed repair work. After the repair work was completed, Sellers obtained title to the residence and listed it for sale. Sellers had no direct contact with Gattis, who purchased the residence from Sellers. The purchase was executed through a standard-form real estate contract, approved by the Colorado Real Estate Commission: Contract to Buy and Sell Real Estate, to which no changes were made. Several years after taking title to the residence, Gattis commenced action, pleading several tort claims alleging only economic losses based on damage to the residence resulting from expansive soils. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Brady Iandiorio, Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell, LLC
    Mr. Iandiorio may be contacted at iandiorio@hhmrlaw.com

    Balcony Collapses Killing Six People

    June 17, 2015 —
    Six college students died from injuries that occurred when a balcony collapsed at a downtown apartment complex in Berkeley, California, according to Berkeleyside. The city of Berkeley ordered a structural inspection of the remaining balconies at Library Gardens, and to immediately remove the failed balcony. The following day Berkeleyside reported that the city ordered the Library Gardens’ owners to remove another balcony after “[i]nspectors determined that the third-floor balcony ‘was structurally unsafe and presented a collapse hazard endangering public safety.’” Berkeley’s mayor, Tom Bates, stated that “investigators believe the wood wasn’t sealed properly at the time of construction and was damaged by moisture as a result,” the Wall Street Journal reported. Read the full story, 6/16/15 Berkeleyside article... Read the full story, 6/17/15 Berkeleyside article... Read the full story, Wall Street Journal... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Which Cities have the Most Affordable Homes?

    October 08, 2014 —
    Builder analyzed U.S. cities with populations of half a million or more and then filtered further with cities that have a “median new home closing price under $250,000, a first mortgage rate below 4 percent for new homes, and a median new home price per square foot below $125.” Topping the list was El Paso, Texas with the lowest median price ($168,600). Fifth on the list was San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas with a median price of $230,400. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of