• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes building expert Westmont Illinois tract home building expert Westmont Illinois hospital construction building expert Westmont Illinois production housing building expert Westmont Illinois structural steel construction building expert Westmont Illinois retail construction building expert Westmont Illinois Medical building building expert Westmont Illinois low-income housing building expert Westmont Illinois high-rise construction building expert Westmont Illinois multi family housing building expert Westmont Illinois Subterranean parking building expert Westmont Illinois institutional building building expert Westmont Illinois concrete tilt-up building expert Westmont Illinois landscaping construction building expert Westmont Illinois office building building expert Westmont Illinois condominium building expert Westmont Illinois condominiums building expert Westmont Illinois parking structure building expert Westmont Illinois custom home building expert Westmont Illinois casino resort building expert Westmont Illinois mid-rise construction building expert Westmont Illinois housing building expert Westmont Illinois
    Westmont Illinois building consultant expertWestmont Illinois construction expert witness public projectsWestmont Illinois reconstruction expert witnessWestmont Illinois architectural expert witnessWestmont Illinois window expert witnessWestmont Illinois expert witness commercial buildingsWestmont Illinois building envelope expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Westmont, Illinois

    Illinois Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: HB4873 Pending: The Notice and Opportunity to Repair Act provides that a construction professional shall be liable to a homeowner for damages caused by the acts or omissions of the professional and his or her agents, employees, or subcontractors. This bill requires the service of notice to the professional of the complained-of defect in the construction by the homeowner prior to commencement of a lawsuit. Allows the professional to make an offer of repair or settlement and to rescind this offer if the claimant fails to respond within 30 days.

    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Westmont Illinois

    No state license required for general contracting. License required for roofing.

    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Northern Illinois Home Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1434
    3695 Darlene Ct Ste 102
    Aurora, IL 60504

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Fox Valley
    Local # 1431
    PO Box 1146
    Saint Charles, IL 60174

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    SouthWest Suburban Home Builders Association
    Local # 1432
    10767 W 163rd Pl
    Orland Park, IL 60467

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Chicago
    Local # 1425
    5999 S. New Wilke Rd Ste 104
    Rolling Meadows, IL 60008

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of the Greater Rockford Area
    Local # 1465
    631 N Longwood St Suite 102
    Rockford, IL 61107

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Kankakee
    Local # 1445
    221 S Schuyler Ave Ste B
    Kankakee, IL 60901

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Greater Peoria
    Local # 1455
    1599 N Main Street
    East Peoria, IL 61611

    Westmont Illinois Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Expert News and Information
    For Westmont Illinois

    New Case Alert: Oregon Supreme Court Prohibits Insurer’s Attempt to Relitigate Insured’s Liability

    Bad Faith Claim for Inadequate Investigation Does Not Survive Summary Judgment

    Delaware Court Holds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship

    Denial of Claim for Concealment or Fraud Reversed by Sixth Circuit

    Insurance Policies Broadly Defining “Suits” May Prompt an Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Indemnify During the Chapter 558 Pre-Suit Notice Process

    Sept. 11 Victims Rejected by U.S. High Court on Lawsuit

    Connecting Construction Project Information: Open Technology Databases Improve Project Communication, Collaboration and Visibility

    Did the Building Boom Lead to a Boom in Construction Defects?

    The “Program Accessibility” Exception for Public Entities Under the ADA

    Follow Up on Continental Western v. Shay Construction

    Demand for New Homes Good News for Home Builders

    Who Says You Can’t Choose between Liquidated Damages or Actual Damages?

    Earth Movement Exclusion Bars Coverage

    California Supreme Court Endorses City Authority to Adopt Inclusionary Housing Ordinance

    Are You a Construction Lienor?

    Building Permits Up in USA Is a Good Sign

    Williams v. Athletic Field: Hugely Important Lien Case Argued Before Supreme Court

    Building and Landscape Standards Enacted in Response to the Governor's Mandatory Water Restrictions Dealing with the Drought and Possible Effects of El Niño

    Pentagon Has Big Budget for Construction in Colorado

    Renters Who Bought Cannot Sue for Construction Defects

    Megaproject Savings Opportunities

    Hawaii Supreme Court Tackles "Other Insurance" Issues

    Vacant Property and the Right of Redemption in Pennsylvania

    Municipalities Owe a Duty to Pedestrians Regardless of Whether a Sidewalk Presents an “Open and Obvious” Hazardous Condition. (WA)

    Liebherr Claims Crane Not Cause of Brazil Stadium Construction Accident

    Construction Demand Unsteady, Gains in Some Regions

    You Are Your Brother’s Keeper. Direct Contractors in California Now Responsible for Wage Obligations of Subcontractors

    After Breaching its Duty to Defend, Insurer Must Indemnify

    Living Not So Large: The sprawl of television shows about very small houses

    Approaches to Managing Job Site Inventory

    Occurrence Found, Business Risk Exclusions Do Not Bar Coverage for Construction Defects

    Visual Construction Diaries – Interview with Jeff Sassinsky of Fovea Aero

    Maine Case Demonstrates High Risk for Buying Home “As Is”

    Homebuilder Confidence Takes a Beating

    Charges in Kansas Water Park Death

    Testing Your Nail Knowledge

    5 Ways Equipment Financing is Empowering Small Construction Businesses

    Economic Loss Doctrine Bars Negligence Claim Against Building Company Owner, Individually

    Question of Parties' Intent Prevents Summary Judgment for Insurer

    No Retrofit without Repurposing in Los Angeles

    Contractual Indemnification Limitation on Florida Public Projects

    Retainage on Pennsylvania Public Contracts

    What to do When the Worst Happens: Responding to a Cybersecurity Breach

    New Window Insulation Introduced to U.S. Market

    Construction Defects could become Issue in Governor’s Race

    Builder Pipeline in U.S. at Eight-Year High: Under the Hood

    Construction Defect Fund Approved for Bankrupt Las Vegas Builder

    Former Sponsor of the Lenox Facing Suit in Supreme Court

    BofA Said to Near Mortgage Deal for Up to $17 Billion

    Lawsuits over Roof Dropped
    Corporate Profile


    The Westmont, Illinois Building Expert Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Westmont, Illinois

    Witt Named to 2017 Super Lawyers

    March 29, 2017 —
    The Witt Law Firm is proud to announce that Super Lawyers has recognized lawyer Jesse Howard Witt as Top Rated Construction Litigation Attorney in Boulder Colorado. Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. Super Lawyers selects attorneys using a patented multiphase selection process. Peer nominations and evaluations are combined with independent research. Each candidate is evaluated on 12 indicators of peer recognition and professional achievement. Selections are made on an annual, state-by-state basis. Reprinted courtesy of Jesse Howard Witt, Acerbic Witt Mr. Witt may be contacted at Read the full story... Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Construction Contract Clauses That May or May Not Have Your Vote – Part 3

    November 23, 2016 —
    Scope, time and cost provisions may be the most important clauses in your construction contract but they’re not the only ones which can impact your bottom line. The third in a multi-part series, here are some other important construction contract clauses that may determine whether you come out a winner.
      Provision: Supervisory Personnel, Employees, and Authority to Bind Provisions
    • Typical Provision: ”At all times during performance of the Work, Subcontractor shall have at the job site a competent supervisor approved by Owner. Subcontractor’s supervisor shall be deemed a representative of Subcontractor and all communications given to Subcontractor’s supervisor shall be as binding as if such communications were given to Subcontractor. Should Contractor object to Subcontractor’s supervisor’s presence at the job site, or the presence at the job site, or the presence at the job site of any other employee or agent of Subcontractor or any employee or agent of Subcontractor of Subcontractor, Subcontractor shall cause such persons to be replaced immediately as directed by Contractor.”
    • What it Means: Higher-tiered parties have a legitimate interest in ensuring that only competent individuals are allowed to perform work on a project and in ensuring that there are peaceable relations at a job site. Higher-tiered parties also have an interest in ensuring that directives and agreements made and reached in the field are followed. However, it is unreasonable for higher-tiered party or to require that such personnel be able to bind that lower-tiered party to agreements best decided by others.
    • What You Can Do: Lower-tiered parties should seek to include language which provides that only “reasonable” changes to personnel are allowed and, as necessary, limit by category or issue the types of items on-site personnel can bind the lower-tiered party to.
    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at

    Client Alert: Disclosure of Plaintiff’s Status as Undocumented Alien to Prospective Jury Panel Grounds for Mistrial

    February 05, 2015 —
    In Velasquez v. Centrome, Inc. (No. B247080, filed 1/30/2015) the Court of Appeal, Second District, held that a trial judge’s disclosure to the panel of prospective jurors of plaintiff’s status as an undocumented alien was prejudicial and grounds for a new trial. Plaintiff, Wilfredo Velasquez, brought suit against defendant, Centrome, Inc., alleging personal injuries related to on-the-job exposure to diacetyl, which was purportedly distributed by Centrome. Prior to trial, numerous motions in limine were filed with the trial court including a motion brought by Plaintiff to preclude Centrome from referring to or making any comments about Mr. Velasquez’s citizenship or immigration status. Plaintiff contended the information was not relevant (as no loss of earnings claim was asserted), and was substantially more prejudicial than probative. Defendant opposed the Motion arguing the information was relevant for the limited purpose of allowing expert testimony about Mr. Velasquez’s inability as an undocumented alien to participate in a lung transplant he claimed was needed. The Court deferred ruling on the motion. Reprinted courtesy of Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP attorneys R. Bryan Martin, Lawrence S. Zucker II and Kristian B. Moriarty Mr. Martin may be contacted at; Mr. Zucker may be contacted at; and Mr. Moriarty may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Minneapolis Condo Shortage Blamed on Construction Defect Law

    November 20, 2013 —
    Demand for condos in the Minneapolis, Minnesota area is outstripping demand. Currently inventory of available condos represents less than four months’ worth of sales. But despite the demand, only three condominium buildings are under construction in the Minneapolis metropolitan area. Some blame this on difficulty in finding financing, where some lenders are looking for projects to be sold before the builders get the money to build what they’ve just sold. Another problem is Minnesota construction defect law. “There are law firms in this town that have filed lawsuit after lawsuit on behalf of homeowners associations alleging construction defects,” said one builder, Kelly Doran, who now builds luxury apartment buildings. “”With that 10-year warranty, there’s no way I would build condos.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Drought Dogs Developers in California's Soaring Housing Market

    September 17, 2015 —
    California’s already tight housing market is facing another long-term complication: drought. The state’s dry spell is creating challenges for developers at a time when home prices are soaring because of limited inventory. The metropolitan areas of San Jose, San Francisco and San Diego had the nation’s biggest gap between the number of new jobs and residential building permits from 2012 to 2014, according to a report Wednesday by the National Association of Realtors. Now the drought, into its fourth year, stands to curb affordability further. “It’s contributing to price appreciation by restricting supply,” said Mark Boud, founder of Real Estate Economics, a housing-consulting firm based in Irvine, California. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of John Gittelsohn, Bloomberg

    Should CGL Insurer have Duty to Defend Insured During Chapter 558 Notice of Construction Defects Process???

    September 01, 2016 —
    Does a CGL insurer have a duty to defend its insured-contractor during Florida Statutes Chapter 558 notice of construction defects pre-suit process? This answer is currently undecided and will be up to the Florida Supreme Court to decide. (It is on appeal stemming from a federal district court saying that an insurer does not have a duty to defend its insured-contractor in the 558 process based on the definition of the word “suit” in the CGL policy.) Why is this an important issue? The 558 pre-suit notice of construction defects process is designed to facilitate an avenue for construction defect lawsuits to get resolved without having to file a lawsuit or, at least, have issues narrowed before a lawsuit needs to be filed. (Check here for a summary of the 558 process.) It requires pre-suit notifications so that implicated parties can become aware of the defects and have an opportunity to inspect the defects / damage, test the defects / damage, and respond to the notice of construction defects; it provides an avenue for beneficial pre-suit discovery. Through participating in the 558 process, the contractor and/or design professional (and those downstream from them) can: (i) offer to remedy the defect, (ii) settle the defect, whether through money or a combination of money and repairs, (iii) dispute the defect, or (iv) advise that available insurance proceeds will be determined by its liability insurer. See Fla. Stat. s. 558.004. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of David M. Adelstein, Kirwin Norris
    Mr. Adelstein may be contacted at

    Depreciating Labor Costs May be Factor in Actual Cash Value

    April 20, 2016 —
    The Minnesota Supreme Court considered a certified question from the the U.S. District Court regarding consideration of depreciating labor costs in determining the actual cash value of a loss. Wilcox v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 2016 Min. LEXIS 50 (Minn. Feb. 10, 2016). The insureds' home was damaged by hail. State Farm provided a written estimate that calculated the actual cash value of the loss. To estimate the actual cash value of the damaged property, State Farm first calculated the replacement costs of individual items, such as roof flashing, siding, fascia, gutters, and window screens. Next, State Farm subtracted the pre-loss depreciation of some, but not all, individual items. For example, State Farm depreciated the cost of removing and replacing certain materials, such as siding. State Farm did not depreciate the cost of the new siding separately from the cost of the labor required to install the new siding on the home. Instead, State Farm calculated the removal and replacement of the siding as a single cost, then depreciated the removal-and-replacement cost as a whole. The cost of labor to repair or replace the damaged property was referred to by the court as "embedded labor costs." Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at

    Cogently Written Opinion Finds Coverage for Loss Caused By Defective Concrete

    November 07, 2012 —
    If ever in need of a concise, well-reasoned opinion on “occurrence,” “property damage” and applicability of the business risk exclusions, turn to Pamperin Rentals II, LLC v. R.G. Hendricks & Sons Construction, Inc., 2012 Wis Ct. App. LEXIS 698 (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 5, 2012). A contractor was hired to install concrete during construction of seven gas stations. Red-D-Mix provided the concrete. The contractor and Red-D-Mix were eventually sued by the gas stations, based upon allegations that the concrete was defectively manufactured and installed. The gas stations alleged that Red-D-Mix supplied concrete that was defective and resulted in damages, including the need to repair nearby asphalt. Red-D-Mix tendered to its insurers, who denied coverage. Suit was filed and the insurers moved for summary judgment. The trial court determined there were no allegations of either “property damage” or an “occurrence.” Therefore, there was no duty to defend or indemnify Red-D-Mix. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii.
    Mr. Eyerly can be contacted at