• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    concrete tilt-up building expert Slocomb Alabama office building building expert Slocomb Alabama hospital construction building expert Slocomb Alabama mid-rise construction building expert Slocomb Alabama institutional building building expert Slocomb Alabama custom homes building expert Slocomb Alabama housing building expert Slocomb Alabama Medical building building expert Slocomb Alabama high-rise construction building expert Slocomb Alabama production housing building expert Slocomb Alabama retail construction building expert Slocomb Alabama casino resort building expert Slocomb Alabama Subterranean parking building expert Slocomb Alabama low-income housing building expert Slocomb Alabama structural steel construction building expert Slocomb Alabama landscaping construction building expert Slocomb Alabama multi family housing building expert Slocomb Alabama condominium building expert Slocomb Alabama industrial building building expert Slocomb Alabama tract home building expert Slocomb Alabama condominiums building expert Slocomb Alabama custom home building expert Slocomb Alabama
    Slocomb Alabama expert witness roofingSlocomb Alabama civil engineering expert witnessSlocomb Alabama concrete expert witnessSlocomb Alabama expert witness windowsSlocomb Alabama stucco expert witnessSlocomb Alabama building code expert witnessSlocomb Alabama consulting general contractor
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Slocomb, Alabama

    Alabama Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: Although there is case law precedent for right to repair, Title 6 Article 13A states action must be commenced within 2 years after cause and not more than 13 years after completion of construction.

    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Slocomb Alabama

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.

    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Home Builders Association of Dothan & Wiregrass Area
    Local # 0132
    PO Box 9791
    Dothan, AL 36304
    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    Enterprise Home Builders Association
    Local # 0133
    PO Box 310861
    Enterprise, AL 36331
    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Metro Mobile Inc
    Local # 0156
    1613 University Blvd S
    Mobile, AL 36609

    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    Baldwin County Home Builders Association
    Local # 0184
    916 PLantation Blvd
    Fairhope, AL 36532

    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    South Alabama Home Builders Association
    Local # 0102
    PO Box 190
    Greenville, AL 36037
    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Alabama
    Local # 0100
    PO Box 241305
    Montgomery, AL 36124

    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    Greater Montgomery Home Builders Association
    Local # 0164
    6336 Woodmere Blvd
    Montgomery, AL 36117

    Slocomb Alabama Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Expert News and Information
    For Slocomb Alabama

    Harsh New Time Limits on Construction Defect Claims

    Southern California Lost $8 Billion in Construction Wages

    San Francisco Law Firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman Hired New Partner

    Genuine Dispute Over Cause of Damage and Insureds’ Demolition Before Inspection Negate Bad Faith and Elder Abuse Claims

    No Coverage Under Ensuing Loss Provision

    The Big Three: The 9th Circuit Joins The 6th Circuit and 7th Circuit in Holding That Sanctions For Bad-Faith Litigation Tactics Can Only Be Awarded Against Individual Lawyers and Not Law Firms

    Nevada Bill Would Bring Changes to Construction Defects

    National Demand Increases for Apartments, Refuting Calls for Construction Defect Immunity in Colorado

    Alabama Limits Duty to Defend for Construction Defects

    U.S. Housing Starts Exceed Estimates After a Stronger December

    Is Construction Defect Notice under Florida Repair Statute a Suit?

    OSHA Begins Enforcement of its Respirable Crystalline Silica in Construction Standard. Try Saying That Five Times Real Fast

    Hurdles with Triggering a Subcontractor Performance Bond

    Unpaid Hurricane Maria Insurance Claims, New Laws in Puerto Rico, and the Lesson for all Policyholders

    Are Construction Defect Laws Inhibiting the Development of Attached Ownership Housing in Colorado?

    Sales of Existing Homes in U.S. Fall to Lowest Since 2012

    N.J. Voters Approve $116 Million in School Construction

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    Beverly Hills Voters Reject Plan for Enclave's Tallest Building

    The California Legislature Passes SB 496 Limiting Design Professional Defense and Indemnity Obligations

    Colorado Senate Revives Construction Defects Reform Bill

    The Hidden Price of Outdated Damage Prevention Laws: Part I

    Insured's Testimony On Expectation of Coverage Deemed Harmless

    “Other Insurance” and Indemnity Provisions Determine Which Insurer Must Cover

    Wall Enclosing Georgia Neighborhood Built for Walking Dead TV Show

    Construction Defect Headaches Can Be Avoided

    Hake Law Attorneys Join National Law Firm Wilson Elser

    Properly Trigger the Performance Bond

    Musk Says ‘Chicago Express’ Tunnel Project Could Start Work in Months

    Improvements to AIA Contracts?

    "Is the Defective Work Covered by Insurance?"

    Appeals Court Affirms Carrier’s Duty to Pay Costs Taxed Against Insured in Construction Defect Suit

    California Supreme Court Confirms the Right to Repair Act as the Exclusive Remedy for Seeking Relief for Defects in New Residential Construction

    Is Your Design Professional Construction Contract too Friendly? (Law Note)

    Subcontractor Sued for Alleged Defective Work

    Harmon Tower Demolition on Hold

    Mediation Scheduled for Singer's Construction Defect Claims

    HP Unveils Cheaper, 3-D Printing System to Spur Sales

    New Home Sales Slip, but Still Strong

    Playing Hot Potato: Indemnity Strikes Again

    No Rest for the Weary: Project Completion Is the Beginning of Litigation

    In Personal Injury Actions, Prejudgment Interest on Costs Not Recoverable

    Missouri Construction Company Sues Carpenter Union for Threatening Behavior

    New Iowa Law Revises Construction Defects Statute of Repose

    Ninth Circuit Finds Policy’s Definition of “Policy Period” Fatal to Insurer’s “Related Claims” Argument

    Jobsite Safety, Workforce Shortage Drive Innovation in Machine Automation

    Henderson Land to Spend $839 Million on Hong Kong Retail Complex

    The Future Looks Bright for Construction in 2015

    A Survey of Trends and Perspectives in Construction Defect Decisions

    Sierra Pacific v. Bradbury Goes Unchallenged: Colorado’s Six-Year Statute of Repose Begins When a Subcontractor’s Scope of Work Ends
    Corporate Profile


    The Slocomb, Alabama Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Slocomb's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Slocomb, Alabama

    Consequential Damages From Subcontractor's Faulty Work Constitutes "Property Damage" and An "Occurrence"

    September 03, 2015 —
    The New Jersey appellate court found that the unintended and unexpected consequential damages caused by the subcontractor's defective work constituted "property damage" and an "occurrence." Cypress Point Condo. Ass'n v. Adria Towers, L.L.C., 2015 WL 4111890 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. July 9, 2015). The insured developer hired subcontractors to perform all of the construction work at a condominium project. The subcontractors failed to properly install the roof, flashing, gutters and leaders, brick and EIFS facade, windows, doors and sealants. The AOAO sued the developer, who served as the general contractor, its insurers, and various subcontractors.The AOAO conceded that replacement costs did not constitute "property damage" and an "occurrence" under the policy. The faulty workmanship, however, also caused consequential damages to the common areas and unit owners' property, including damage to steel supports, exterior sheathing and interior sheathing and sheetrock, insulation and other interior areas of the building. Nevertheless, the trial judge determined there was no property damage or "occurrence", and granted summary judgment to the insurers. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at

    Superior Court Of Pennsylvania Holds That CASPA Does Not Allow For Individual Claims Against A Property Owner’s Principals Or Shareholders

    January 07, 2015 —
    In Scungio Borst Assocs. v. 410 Shurs Lane Developers, LLC, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania held that an individual principal/shareholder of a property owner could not be held personally liable as an “agent of the owner” for unpaid invoices, penalties, and attorneys fees under the Pennsylvania Contractor and Subcontractor Payment Act (CASPA), 73 P.S. §§ 501-516, even though the property owner itself had failed to make payments allegedly due under a construction contract. CASPA is a Pennsylvania statute which is designed to protect contractors and subcontractors from nonpayment and which, to that end, establishes rules and deadlines for payment under construction contracts between property owners, contractors, and subcontractors. An owner or contractor who does not adhere to the Act’s payment requirements is subject to the imposition of interest, penalties, and attorneys’ fees. In this recent case, the property owner, a limited liability company, had retained the plaintiff contractor to perform construction services on a condominium project. Upon completion of the work, the contractor was not paid approximately $1.5 million that it was owed under the contract. The contractor filed suit under CASPA to obtain the payment it was owed plus interest, penalties and fees, and named both the property owner and its individual principal as defendants. The trial court granted summary judgment to the individual principal on all claims asserted against him, and the contractor appealed, arguing that CASPA allows for claims against both a property owner and its principal when the principal is an “agent of the owner acting with the owner’s authority.” Reprinted courtesy of Michael Jervis, White and Williams LLP and William J. Taylor, White and Williams LLP Mr. Jervis may be contacted at; Mr. Taylor may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    MGM Begins Dismantling of the Las Vegas Harmon Tower

    June 26, 2014 —
    MGM has begun to dismantle the $8.5 billion, incomplete Harmon Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. The demolition process is expected to take up to a year. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reported that construction of the tower was halted in 2008 after construction defects were allegedly discovered. Later, “the building was deemed structurally unsound.” “Instead of blowing the building up in grand fashion, contractors hired by MGM Resorts are now removing scrap metal and other materials from the building, along with taking off the blue-tinged glass that has covered the structure for the last five years,” Howard Stutz wrote in the Las Vegas-Review Journal. “The process also includes installing pedestrian protection systems outside the structure above adjacent sidewalks and walkways.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Executing Documents with Powers of Attorney and Confessions of Judgment in PA Just Got Easier

    October 27, 2016 —
    Certain tedious requirements in Pennsylvania for the execution of a document used in a commercial transaction which contains a power of attorney have been eliminated. Act 103 of 2016, which was signed by Governor Wolf on October 4, 2016, exempts certain powers of attorney from the requirement that it be acknowledged by a notary public as well as other formalities. Reprinted courtesy of White and Williams LLP attorneys Thomas C. Rogers, Nancy Sabol Frantz and Susan Fetterman Mr. Rogers may be contacted at Ms. Frantz may be contacted at Ms. Fetterman may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Experts Weigh In on Bilingual Best Practices for Jobsites

    February 22, 2018 —
    It’s the rare construction firm that doesn’t cite people as its most important resource. And over the past two decades, that asset has become increasingly bilingual. Indeed, more than 27% of workers in construction are Hispanic or of Latino ethnicity, according to the most recent available data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Jim Parsons, Engineering News-Record

    OSHA Penalties—What Happened with International Nutrition

    April 15, 2015 —
    For those of you in and around Omaha, you recall the tragic collapse of International Nutrition’s plant in early 2014, killing two workers and injuring several others. OSHA swept onto the scene and issued citations. Surprisingly, the penalties totaled only $120,000. While a large sum, one would think two deaths and a score of injuries would generate a larger fine. International Nutrition appealed the penalties and they have now been reduced to $78,000, about a 1/3 reduction. Below, I’ll set forth what happened. The Original Penalties International Nutrition was originally fined $120,650.00 for citations ranging from willful, serious, to other-than-serious. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Craig Martin, Lamson, Dugan and Murray, LLP
    Mr. Martin may be contacted at

    A Year Later, Homeowners Still Repairing Damage from Sandy

    October 01, 2013 —
    The New York and New Jersey coastal communities are still in the thick of rebuilding and repairing after hurricane Sandy struck almost a year ago. Newsday reports that in the eight months following the October 2012 storm, more than 23,000 building permits were issued in Long Island communities, an 11 percent rise over the previous year. The town of Long Beach, New York has waived fees and hired more staff in order to encourage people to rebuild, in order to rebuild the town’s tax base. Homeowners aren’t going it alone, New York expects to fund more than $1 billion of rebuilding for homeowners who are unable to afford repairing their homes. At this point, the state is still processing more than five thousand requests for grants. The money is still in the state’s coffers. Other homeowners are still filing insurance claims. While towns are busy issuing building permits, contractors are busy too. Bill Sims of Sims Steel said that his business has changed from commercial construction to raising homes higher to put them above future floods. “There’s probably been more homes raised this last year than in the previous 20 years,” he told Newsday. Another contractor, Pat Gordon said that he is “only taking what we can handle.” He described Long Beach as “a traffic jam of construction trucks that has never been seen before.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    WA Supreme Court Allows Property Owner to Sue Engineering Firm for Lost Profits

    February 25, 2014 —
    In the Daily Journal of Commerce, Scott A. Smith and James H. Wendell discussed the recent Washington Supreme Court decision in Donatelli v D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers. The court’s ruling casts “doubt on a company's ability to limit its liability for economic losses arising out of a contract dispute.” The Donatellis hired D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers to develop vacant land in King County, however, the “project did not go according to plan and the real estate market collapsed before the project was completed,” according to the Daily Journal of Commerce. The “Donatellis lost their property through foreclosure” and then “sued the engineering firm for more than $1.5 million in lost profits.” D. R. Strong Consulting Engineers asked for the negligence claims to be dismissed “because the parties' contract contained a provision limiting the engineering firm's liability to the amount of its fee for ‘any injury or loss on account of any error, omission, or other professional negligence.’” However, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that “the case could proceed in the trial court on a theory that the engineers could be liable if they made negligent misrepresentations that induced the Donatellis to enter into the contract in the first place.” Smith and Wendell stated that because of “this decision, engineering, architectural, construction, and other professional service companies may now face damage claims they thought they were contractually protected against.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of