BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    landscaping construction building expert Noma Florida custom home building expert Noma Florida townhome construction building expert Noma Florida industrial building building expert Noma Florida condominiums building expert Noma Florida institutional building building expert Noma Florida concrete tilt-up building expert Noma Florida custom homes building expert Noma Florida tract home building expert Noma Florida low-income housing building expert Noma Florida high-rise construction building expert Noma Florida retail construction building expert Noma Florida parking structure building expert Noma Florida Medical building building expert Noma Florida hospital construction building expert Noma Florida housing building expert Noma Florida multi family housing building expert Noma Florida casino resort building expert Noma Florida condominium building expert Noma Florida production housing building expert Noma Florida mid-rise construction building expert Noma Florida office building building expert Noma Florida
    Noma Florida construction expert witnessNoma Florida ada design expert witnessNoma Florida architecture expert witnessNoma Florida defective construction expertNoma Florida expert witness structural engineerNoma Florida hospital construction expert witnessNoma Florida contractor expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Noma, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Noma Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tri-County Home Builders
    Local # 1073
    PO Box 420
    Marianna, FL 32447

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Tallahassee Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1064
    1835 Fiddler Court
    Tallahassee, FL 32308

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Okaloosa-Walton Cos
    Local # 1056
    1980 Lewis Turner Blvd
    Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Florida
    Local # 1048
    4400 Bayou Blvd Suite 45
    Pensacola, FL 32503

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Florida Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 1000
    PO Box 1259
    Tallahassee, FL 32302

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Columbia County Builders Association
    Local # 1007
    PO Box 7353
    Lake City, FL 32055

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Northeast Florida Builders Association
    Local # 1024
    103 Century 21 Dr Ste 100
    Jacksonville, FL 32216

    Noma Florida Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Noma Florida


    Towards Paperless Construction: PaperLight

    The Activist Group Suing the Suburbs for Bigger Buildings

    Construction Defect Specialist Joins Kansas City Firm

    One Sector Is Building Strength Amid Slow Growth

    New York Court Holds That the “Lesser of Two” Doctrine Limits Recoverable Damages in Subrogation Actions

    A Word to the Wise about Construction Defects

    Nevada Assembly Passes Construction Defect Bill

    Beyond the Disneyland Resort: Museums

    Good Signs for Housing Market in 2013

    The Expansion of Potential Liability of Construction Managers and Consultants

    Excess Carrier's Declaratory Judgment Action Stayed While Underlying Case Still Pending

    The Regulations on the Trump Administration's Chopping Block

    Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Honors Construction Attorney

    Comparing Contracts: A Review of the AIA 201 and ConsensusDocs - Part II

    Everyone's Moving to Seattle, and It's Stressing Out Sushi Lovers

    5 Impressive Construction Projects in North Carolina

    Tetra Tech-U.S. Cleanup Dispute in San Francisco Grows

    Leaning San Francisco Tower Seen Sinking From Space

    Eighth Circuit Rejects Retroactive Application of Construction Defect Legislation

    Home Prices Expected to Increase All Over the U.S.

    Jean Nouvel’s NYC ‘Vision Machine’ Sued Over Construction Defects

    Is Solar the Next Focus of Construction Defect Suits?

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2019

    Bert L. Howe & Associates Brings Professional Development Series to Their San Antonio Office

    That Boilerplate Language May Just Land You in Hot Water

    U.S. Construction Spending Rose in 2017 by Least in Six Years

    Top 10 Cases of 2019

    Homeowner's Mold Claim Denied Due to Spoilation

    A UK Bridge That Is a Lesson on How to Build Infrastructure

    Hunton Andrews Kurth Associate Cary D. Steklof Selected to Florida Trend’s Legal Elite Up & Comers List for 2019

    Obama Asks for $302 Billion to Fix Bridges and Potholes

    10 Answers to Those Nagging Mechanics Lien Questions Keeping You Up at Night. Kind of

    A Good Examination of Fraud, Contract and Negligence Per Se

    Damage to Plaintiffs' Home Caused By Unmoored Boats Survives Surface Water Exclusion

    South Carolina Homeowners May Finally Get Class Action for Stucco Defects

    Construction Firm Sues Town over Claims of Building Code Violations

    New Spending Measure Has Big Potential Infrastructure Boost

    Notice of Completion Determines Mechanics Lien Deadline

    County Elects Not to Sue Over Construction Defect Claims

    New Jersey Condominium Owners Sue FEMA

    Old Case Teaches New Tricks

    Basement Foundation Systems’ Getting an Overhaul

    Should I Pull the Pin? Contractor and Subcontractor Termination for Cause

    Homebuilding Still on the Rise

    New Recommendations for Healthy and Safe Housing Conditions

    Sixth Circuit Rejects Claim for Reverse Bad Faith

    Water Drainage Case Lacks Standing

    Caterpillar Said to Be Focus of Senate Overseas Tax Probe

    Occurrence Found, Business Risk Exclusions Do Not Bar Coverage for Construction Defects

    Part II: Key Provisions of School Facility Construction & Design Contracts
    Corporate Profile

    NOMA FLORIDA BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    Leveraging from more than 5500 construction defect and claims related expert witness designations, the Noma, Florida Building Expert Group provides a wide range of trial support and consulting services to Noma's most acknowledged construction practice groups, CGL carriers, builders, owners, and public agencies. Drawing from a diverse pool of construction and design professionals, BHA is able to simultaneously analyze complex claims from the perspective of design, engineering, cost, or standard of care.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Noma, Florida

    No Hiring Surge by Homebuilders Says Industry Group

    February 14, 2013 —
    Looking at data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the National Association of Home Builders found that while hiring levels in construction remain strong, there hasn’t been a surge in hiring in this particular sector. December found 92,000 open construction position, with the NAHB noting that home builders are still concerned about finding qualified workers. While there has not been surge in hiring, home building is on the increase. The NAHB says that “this could be due to increased hours for existing workers,” which would not be “a sustainable situation.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    A New Way to Design in 3D – Interview with Pouria Kay of Grib

    August 24, 2017 —
    In this podcast interview with Pouria Kay, CEO and Co-founder at Grib, we talk about the startup’s new, intuitive 3D design tool. Grib® is a cloud–based software that turns a mobile device into a universal controller. With Grib, both young and professional designers can sketch complex objects without first having to learn cumbersome 3D software. You work intuitively in actual 3D space and interact with your environment using augmented reality. All you need is pen, paper, and your mobile device. You can share models with friends, order a print, or export them if needed. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Aarni Heiskanen, AEC Business
    Mr. Heiskanen may be contacted at info@aepartners.fi

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Will Not Address Trigger for DEP Environmental Cleanup Action at This Time

    August 14, 2018 —
    On July 18, 2018, in Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Company v. Johnson Matthey, Inc., et al., No. 24 MAP 2017 (Pa. July 18, 2018), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court quashed the Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association’s (PMA) appeal seeking review of a ruling denying its motion for summary judgment for an order that coverage for the cleanup of a toxic waste site is limited to the policy in effect when property damage was first discovered. In short, the court found the lower court’s ruling only narrowed the dispute between the parties and is, therefore, interlocutory and not appealable at this time. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Gregory Capps, White & Williams LLP
    Mr. Capps may be contacted at cappsg@whiteandwilliams.com

    Signed, Sealed and (Almost) Delivered: EU Council Authorizes Signing of U.S. – EU Bilateral Insurance Agreement

    August 02, 2017 —
    On July 14, 2017, the Trump administration released a statement indicating that the United States intends to sign the U.S. – EU bilateral insurance agreement. The announcement came several weeks after the Council of the European Union adopted a decision authorizing the signing of this agreement. The agreement attempts to “level the playing field for U.S. insurers and reinsurers operating in the EU.”[1] This U.S. – EU bilateral agreement is a direct response to EU’s January 2016 enactment of Solvency II. Solvency II is a legislative program implemented in all twenty-eight Member States, aimed at codifying EU insurance regulations in an attempt to protect policy holders and to incentivize risk management. We previously wrote about this comprehensive program of insurer regulatory requirements here. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Stella Szantova Giordano, Saxe Doernberger & Vita, P.C.
    Mr. Giordano may be contacted at ssg@sdvlaw.com

    BIM Legal Liabilities: Not That Different

    February 10, 2020 —
    For this week’s Guest Post Friday here at Musings, we welcome Scott P. Fitzsimmons. Scott is an attorney with the construction law firm Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, where he represents contractors, subcontractors, owners, and engineers. He is also a LEED AP and an instructor for AGC of D.C., where he teaches BIM Contract Negotiation and Risk Allocation as part of AGC’s Certificate of Management, Building Information Modeling program. When a new technology is introduced to the construction industry, contractors inevitably ask themselves one question “Great, how can this new gadget get me into trouble?” Building Information Modeling (BIM) is exactly the kind of technology that raises this fear. But, BIM has been around for a few years now, and the construction industry has done a good job of curtailing the fear of unanticipated legal liability. Nevertheless, contractors should be aware of the pitfalls BIM introduces and should know how to limit their risk arising from this new “gadget.” Often described as “CAD on Steroids,” BIM is truly much more than a simple design program. Along with early clash detection, BIM provides time and cost integration; calculates energy efficiency; and assists building maintenance long after project completion. Unlike CAD, BIM also modifies the collaborative nature of a construction project. Thus, subcontractors no longer review a design, submit shop drawings, and go to work. Rather, subcontractors are brought into the design process early in the project and often are asked to contribute to the design long before construction begins. Asking a contractor or subcontractor to provide design services appears to shift the roles of an architect and a contractor. So, the questions abound: Is a contractor now responsible for design? Can the contractor be held responsible for defective design? Do not fret. To date, there has been only one advertised case addressing BIM liability. The reason is simple. For almost a hundred years, the United States Supreme Court has held that contractors are not responsible for defective design on a traditional design-bid-build project. Using BIM, therefore, should not modify a contractor’s responsibility. But, to ensure that your obligations do not extend beyond construction, all BIM requirements should be in writing and made part of your contract. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of The Law Office of Christopher G. Hill
    Mr. Hill may be contacted at chrisghill@constructionlawva.com

    How One Squirrel Taught us a Surprising Amount about Insurance Investigation Lessons Learned from the Iowa Supreme Court

    April 03, 2019 —
    A recent decision issued by the Iowa Supreme Court, City of West Liberty, Iowa v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company, highlights the importance for a policyholder to investigate a loss fully so that a wide range of evidence can be gathered and presented to show why there is coverage. The facts of City of West Liberty are a little unusual, but its lesson is not limited to Iowa insurance law; the issues litigated in this case show the value of investigating what caused a loss regardless of whether the loss occurred in California, Iowa, or elsewhere. Background on the Case City of West Liberty involved an insurance coverage dispute between a municipality owned electrical power plant and its insurance company. The dispute arose from a single adventurous squirrel who climbed onto an outdoor electrical transformer, touching two different parts of the power plant: a portion of the steel frame and a bare cable clamp. In doing so, the squirrel created a “conductive path,” in the words of the Iowa Supreme Court, between the high voltage clamp and the grounded frame. The path, once created, caused significant damage to the transformer and other electrical equipment at the city’s power plant. The city submitted a claim for the resulting damage, but the insurance company denied it. The insurer denied based on an exclusion in the insurance policy for property damage “caused by arcing or by electrical currents other than lightning.” According to the insurance company, the squirrel had no role in causing the damage; all of the damage resulted from arcing, which was excluded from coverage. The ensuing lawsuit focused upon whether the squirrel had a role in causing the damage. If yes, then there would be coverage according to Iowa insurance law; when a loss results from two causes, one of which is covered and the other is not, then there is coverage if the loss occurs from the covered cause. Due to this legal standard, the city contended that, apart from the arcing causing any damage, the squirrel caused the damage too. Because the insurance policy provided protection against mischievous actions performed by squirrels, the city contended that it was entitled to coverage, even if the excluded arcing contributed to the same damage too. Unfortunately, for the city, the Iowa Supreme Court rejected that argument, finding instead that the property damage resulted only from the arcing, which was excluded from coverage. In reaching its conclusion, the court absolved the squirrel of any wrongdoing, finding that it did not cause any of the property damage. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Graham C. Mills, Newmeyer & Dillion
    Mr. Mills may be contacted at graham.mills@ndlf.com

    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    May 18, 2011 —

    In an unpublished decision, the California Fourth Appellate District Court has reversed the judgment of Judge Linda B. Quinn of the Superior Court of San Diego. In the case Inland California, Inc. v. G.A. Abell, Inland, a general contractor had subcontracted with Apache Construction and Precision Electric Company (G.A. Abell).

    Apache alleged that extra demolition and drywall work was needed due to Precision’s electrical work. Inland tendered a defense of Apache’s claims. However, Precision did not provide any defense. Inland withheld payment from Precision.

    At trial, Inland “conceded Precision earned the $98,000 in progress payments Inland withheld.” They were obligated to additionally pay Precision’s costs and attorney fees.

    The Fourth Appellate District court has overturned this and remanded the case back to the lower court. The judges determined that Precision was obligated to defend itself against the claims raised by Apache and therefore vacated the judgment against Inland.

    Read the court’s decision…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    New Households Moving to Apartments

    December 20, 2012 —
    The New York Times reports that multifamily construction—apartment buildings—is leading the recovery in construction. Construction of single-family homes is only a third of the way up from its fall from its earlier heights, while multifamily construction has recovered two-thirds of its peak. Young adults are moving out of their parents’ homes, but instead of buying homes, they’re renting apartments. Houston is adding thousands of new units, leading to a fear of overbuilding. Rents have been rising, but as the supply of apartment units rises, higher rents may be unsustainable. However, during the recession, young adults did not move out of their parents’ homes, leading to about two million doubled-up households. David Crowe, the chief economist of the National Association of Home Builders, noted that “all of the net addition to households since 2004 has been in rentals.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of