BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    custom homes building expert Lauderhill Florida housing building expert Lauderhill Florida retail construction building expert Lauderhill Florida industrial building building expert Lauderhill Florida concrete tilt-up building expert Lauderhill Florida institutional building building expert Lauderhill Florida tract home building expert Lauderhill Florida multi family housing building expert Lauderhill Florida production housing building expert Lauderhill Florida casino resort building expert Lauderhill Florida landscaping construction building expert Lauderhill Florida townhome construction building expert Lauderhill Florida office building building expert Lauderhill Florida structural steel construction building expert Lauderhill Florida mid-rise construction building expert Lauderhill Florida condominiums building expert Lauderhill Florida condominium building expert Lauderhill Florida low-income housing building expert Lauderhill Florida high-rise construction building expert Lauderhill Florida Subterranean parking building expert Lauderhill Florida hospital construction building expert Lauderhill Florida custom home building expert Lauderhill Florida
    Lauderhill Florida construction scheduling expert witnessLauderhill Florida construction expertsLauderhill Florida construction cost estimating expert witnessLauderhill Florida contractor expert witnessLauderhill Florida construction defect expert witnessLauderhill Florida building consultant expertLauderhill Florida construction claims expert witness
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Lauderhill, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Lauderhill Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tri-County Home Builders
    Local # 1073
    PO Box 420
    Marianna, FL 32447

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Tallahassee Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1064
    1835 Fiddler Court
    Tallahassee, FL 32308

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Okaloosa-Walton Cos
    Local # 1056
    1980 Lewis Turner Blvd
    Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Florida
    Local # 1048
    4400 Bayou Blvd Suite 45
    Pensacola, FL 32503

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Florida Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 1000
    PO Box 1259
    Tallahassee, FL 32302

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Columbia County Builders Association
    Local # 1007
    PO Box 7353
    Lake City, FL 32055

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Northeast Florida Builders Association
    Local # 1024
    103 Century 21 Dr Ste 100
    Jacksonville, FL 32216

    Lauderhill Florida Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Lauderhill Florida


    After Fatal House Explosion, Colorado Seeks New Pipeline Regulations

    Tips for Contractors Who Want to Help Rebuild After the California Wildfires

    First Suit Filed for Losses Caused by COVID-19

    Irene May Benefit Construction Industry

    “Rip and Tear” Damage Remains Covered Under CGL Policy as “Accident”—for Now.

    California Attempts to Tackle Housing Affordability Crisis

    Is Performance Bond Liable for Delay Damages?

    Need to Cover Yourself for “Crisis” Changes on a Job Site? Try These Tips (guest post)

    Policyholder Fails to Build Adequate Record to Support Bad Faith Claim

    North Dakota Universities Crumble as Oil Cash Pours In

    Brenner Base Tunnelers Conquer Peaks and Valleys in the Alps

    Late Filing Contractor Barred from Involving Subcontractors in Construction Defect Claim

    With an Eye Already in the Sky, Crane Camera Goes Big Data

    Big Bertha Lawsuits—Hitachi Zosen Weighs In

    Construction Defect Reform Dies in Nevada Senate

    Seller Cannot Compel Arbitration for Its Role in Construction Defect Case<

    Homeowner’s Policy Excludes Coverage for Loss Caused by Chinese Drywall

    Court Again Defines Extent of Contractor’s Insurance Coverage

    Performance Bond Surety Takeover – Using Terminated Contractor To Complete The Work

    Meritage Acquires Legendary Communities

    Lasso Needed to Complete Vegas Hotel Implosion

    Exact Dates Not Needed for Construction Defect Insurance Claim

    History of Defects Leads to Punitive Damages for Bankrupt Developer

    Faulty Workmanship an Occurrence in Iowa – as Long as Other Property Damage is Involved

    Bad Faith and a Partial Summary Judgment in Seattle Construction Defect Case

    Federal Miller Act Payment Bond Claim: Who Gets Paid and Who Does Not? What Are the Deadlines?

    Ohio “property damage” caused by an “occurrence.”

    Jobs Machine in U.S. Created More Than Burger Flippers Last Year

    Conflict of Interest Accusations may Spark Lawsuit Against City and City Manager

    Business Interruption Insurance Coverage Act of 2020: Yet Another Reason to Promptly Notify Insurers of COVID-19 Losses

    Dispute Over Exhaustion of Primary Policy

    Saudi Arabia Awards Contracts for Megacity Neom’s Worker Housing

    Architect Plans to 3D-Print a Two-Story House

    Hurricane Harvey Victims Face New Hurdles In Pursuing Coverage

    WSDOT Seeks Retraction of Waiver Excluding Non-Minority Woman-Owned Businesses from Participation Goals

    Mississippi Floods Prompt New Look at Controversial Dam Project

    Highest Building Levels in Six Years in Southeast Michigan

    President Trump Issued Two New EOs on Energy Infrastructure and Federal Energy Policy

    Remote Trials Can Control Prejudgment Risk

    Judge Tells DOL to Cork its Pistol as New Overtime Rule is Blocked

    The Future for Tall Buildings Could Be Greener

    PA Supreme Court to Rule on Scope of Judges' Credibility Determinations

    All Risk Policy Only Covers Repair to Portion of Dock That Sustains Damage

    City Council Authorizes Settlement of Basement Flooding Cases

    White and Williams Earns Tier 1 Rankings from U.S. News "Best Law Firms" 2020

    Dealing with Hazardous Substances on the Construction Site

    Is Drone Aerial Photography Really Best for Your Construction Projects?

    California Contractor License Bonds to Increase in 2016

    Business Interruption, Food Spoilage Claims Resulting from Off Premise Power Failure Denied

    Towards Paperless Construction: PaperLight
    Corporate Profile

    LAUDERHILL FLORIDA BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Lauderhill, Florida Building Expert Group is comprised from a number of credentialed construction professionals possessing extensive trial support experience relevant to construction defect and claims matters. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to the nation's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, Fortune 500 builders, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, and a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Lauderhill, Florida

    How to Determine the Deadline for Recording a California Mechanics Lien

    September 17, 2015 —
    The California Mechanics Lien is one of the most valuable collection devices available to contractors, subcontractors and suppliers who are unpaid for work performed and materials supplied in relation to a California private works construction project. The mechanics lien allows the claimant to sell the property where the work was performed in order to obtain payment. As noted below, in order to pursue this remedy, certain deadlines must be met. Know Your Mechanics Lien Filing Deadlines Generally Working within deadlines is absolutely crucial to preserving mechanics lien rights under California law. The deadlines differ, depending on whether you are a ”direct” contractor, also known as “original” or “prime” contractor (one who contracts directly with the property owner) or a subcontractor or material supplier. The primary differences are that the direct contractor is only required to serve the “Preliminary Notice” on the Construction Lender (Civil Code section 8200-8216), whereas the subcontractor and material supplier must serve not only the Construction Lender, but also the Owner and Direct Contractor (see Civil Code section 8200(e)). Another difference is that a direct contractor has a longer period of time in which to record a mechanics lien after a valid “notice of completion” or a “notice of cessation” has been recorded (Civil Code sections 8180-8190), (60 days for original contractors as compared to 30 days for subcontractors and suppliers – See Civil Code sections 8412 and 8414). Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William L. Porter, The Porter Law Group
    Mr. Porter may be contacted at bporter@porterlaw.com

    The One New Year’s Resolution You’ll Want to Keep if You’re Involved in Public Works Projects

    January 07, 2015 —
    New Year’s resolutions are hard to keep. In fact, studies (which I have a sneaking suspicion may have been paid for by the tobacco, donut and vacation timeshare lobbies) have found that only 8% of New Year’s resolutions are kept. But, here’s one you’ll want to make sure you keep. Mandatory Registration and Notice Requirements If you’re a public works contractor or subcontractor you only have until March 1, 2015 to register through the California Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) to bid and enter into public works contracts on state and local public works projects. And if you’re a state or local public agency you must provide notice of the DIR’s new registration requirements in all call for bids and contract documents beginning January 1, 2015. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Garret Murai, Wendel Rosen Black & Dean LLP
    Mr. Murai may be contacted at gmurai@wendel.com

    California Posts Nation’s Largest Gain in Construction Jobs

    March 28, 2012 —

    California added about 8,900 construction jobs in January, 2012, as compared to December, 2011, leading the nation in the number of added construction jobs. Thirty-four other states also saw added construction jobs. A year prior, only twenty-eight states added construction jobs. The Associated General Contractors of America analyzed the monthly report from the Labor Department. Ken Simonson, the chief economist for the Associated General Contractors of America noted that “the gains this January partly reflect very mild weather this winter and exceptionally cold and snowy conditions a year before.”

    Read the full story…

    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Massachusetts Pulls Phased Trigger On Its Statute of Repose

    December 21, 2020 —
    In D’Allesandro v. Lennar Hingham Holdings, LLC, 486 Mass 150, 2020 Mass. LEXIS 721, the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts answered a certified question regarding how to apply the Massachusetts statute of repose, Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 260, § 2B, in regards to phased construction projects. The court held that, in this context, the completion of each individual “improvement” to its intended use, or the substantial completion of the individual building and the taking of possession for occupancy by the owner or owners, triggers the statute of repose with respect to the common areas and limited common areas of that building. Additionally, the court held that where a particular improvement is integral to, and intended to serve, multiple buildings (or the development as a whole), the statute of repose is triggered when the discrete improvement is substantially complete and open to its intended use. In D’Allesandro, the action arose out of the construction, marketing, sale and management of the Hewitts Landing Condominium (the Condominium) project. Ultimately, 150 units were constructed over 24 phases of construction, enclosed in 28 different buildings. Throughout construction, the project’s architect submitted declarations to the Town of Hingham swearing that the individual units were “substantially complete” and could be occupied for their intended use. The Town of Hingham then issued certificates of occupancy for the unit or building. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Kyle Rice, White and Williams
    Mr. Rice may be contacted at ricek@whiteandwilliams.com

    Are You Satisfying WISHA Standards?

    October 23, 2018 —
    Many general contractors and property management companies hand over project sites to subcontractors and have little, if anything, to do with the construction work that occurs. However, under RCW 49.17, the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA), general contractors and some property management companies/owners are still responsible for workplace safety for the employees of their subcontractors and independent contractors. The Washington Supreme Court held in Stute v. PBMC that a general contractor could be held liable for injury to a subcontractor’s employee sustained as a result of a WISHA violation.[1] The Stute decision changed the landscape of workplace safety, imposing an expansive, per se liability on general contractors for workplace injuries. Stated differently, general contractors have a specific, non-delegable duty to ensure compliance with WISHA regulations, which extends to all employees on the project site.[2] Washington courts have held that such “expansive liability is justified because ‘a general contractor’s supervisory authority is per se control over the workplace.’”[3] Thus, the non-delegable duty requires general contractors to ensure care is exercised by anyone, even an independent contractor to whom the performance of the duty is entrusted. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Ceslie Blass, Ahlers Cressman & Sleight PLLC
    Ms. Blass may be contacted at ceslie.blass@acslawyers.com

    'There Was No Fighting This Fire,' California Survivor Says

    September 14, 2020 —
    Berry Creek, Calif. (AP) -- John Sykes built his life around his cabin in the dense woods of Northern California. He raised his two children there, expanded it and improved it over time and made it resilient to all kinds of disaster except fire. So when the winds started howling Tuesday and the skies became so dark from smoke that he had to turn on his lights at midday, he didn’t hesitate to leave it all behind in an instant before any evacuation order. With the disaster two years ago in nearby Paradise, in which 85 people perished in the deadliest and most destructive fire in modern state history, still fresh on his mind, Sykes got his wife and a friend into his car and left with only a change of clothes each. “All I could do is look in the rear view mirror and see orange sky and a mushroom cloud and that told me it was hot and to keep going,” Sykes said Friday. “It was a terrifying feeling.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Bloomberg

    Insurer's Daubert Challenge to Insured's Expert Partially Successful

    November 03, 2016 —
    The insurer was partially successful in challenging two of the insureds' experts in a bad faith case. Estate of Arroyo v. Infinity Indem. Ins. Co., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115669 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 29, 2016). The Estate sought to qualify two experts, Lewis N. Jack and James P. Schratz. They were to opine on Infinity's handling of the Estate's insurance claims and the extent of damages warranted in the case. Jack was to testify on Infinity's duties to the insured, its investigation of the case, its reliance on Infinity's agents, and his belief that Infinity could have settled the case. Schratz's opinions mostly concerned Infinity's handling of its investigation. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016–-Federalizing Trade Secret Law

    October 07, 2016 —
    The Defend Trade Secret Act of 2016 (DTSA) was signed into law on May 11, 2016, and became effective immediately. The DTSA allows an owner of a trade secret to sue in federal court for trade secret misappropriation. Previously, only state law governed civil misappropriation of trade secrets. While the DTSA largely mirrors the current state of the law under the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), adopted by 48 states, including Washington,[1] there are some additions found in the new law. The DTSA imposes the same three-year statute of limitations and authorizes remedies similar to those provided under the UTSA. The DTSA also offers new forms of relief, including a provision permitting ex parte seizure orders (that is, without a hearing or response from the opposing party) to prevent further misappropriation of the trade secret. The DTSA further provides for a new definition of trade secret. The UTSA's definition of a trade secret is a “formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process.” Under the DTSA, the definition of a “trade secret” is broadened to include “all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical, economic, or engineering information...whether tangible or intangible...” [2] Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Erin M. Stines & Reed Cahill, Ahlers & Cressman PLLC
    Ms. Stines may be contacted at erin.stines@ac-lawyers.com