BERT HOWE
  • Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    Subterranean parking building expert Chipley Florida condominium building expert Chipley Florida condominiums building expert Chipley Florida casino resort building expert Chipley Florida mid-rise construction building expert Chipley Florida structural steel construction building expert Chipley Florida office building building expert Chipley Florida hospital construction building expert Chipley Florida Medical building building expert Chipley Florida production housing building expert Chipley Florida industrial building building expert Chipley Florida multi family housing building expert Chipley Florida townhome construction building expert Chipley Florida low-income housing building expert Chipley Florida custom homes building expert Chipley Florida high-rise construction building expert Chipley Florida institutional building building expert Chipley Florida concrete tilt-up building expert Chipley Florida landscaping construction building expert Chipley Florida retail construction building expert Chipley Florida housing building expert Chipley Florida parking structure building expert Chipley Florida
    Chipley Florida construction forensic expert witnessChipley Florida hospital construction expert witnessChipley Florida structural concrete expertChipley Florida defective construction expertChipley Florida architectural engineering expert witnessChipley Florida expert witness commercial buildingsChipley Florida construction experts
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Chipley, Florida

    Florida Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: In Title XXXIII Chapter 558, the Florida Legislature establishes a requirement that homeowners who allege construction defects must first notify the construction professional responsible for the defect and allow them an opportunity to repair the defect before the homeowner canbring suit against the construction professional. The statute, which allows homeowners and associations to file claims against certain types of contractors and others, defines the type of defects that fall under the authority of the legislation and the types of housing covered in thelegislation. Florida sets strict procedures that homeowners must follow in notifying construction professionals of alleged defects. The law also establishes strict timeframes for builders to respond to homeowner claims. Once a builder has inspected the unit, the law allows the builder to offer to repair or settle by paying the owner a sum to cover the cost of repairing the defect. The homeowner has the option of accepting the offer or rejecting the offer and filing suit. Under the statute the courts must abate any homeowner legal action until the homeowner has undertaken the claims process. The law also requires contractors, subcontractors and other covered under the law to notify homeowners of the right to cure process.


    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Chipley Florida

    Commercial and Residential Contractors License Required.


    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Tri-County Home Builders
    Local # 1073
    PO Box 420
    Marianna, FL 32447

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Tallahassee Builders Association Inc
    Local # 1064
    1835 Fiddler Court
    Tallahassee, FL 32308

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Okaloosa-Walton Cos
    Local # 1056
    1980 Lewis Turner Blvd
    Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of West Florida
    Local # 1048
    4400 Bayou Blvd Suite 45
    Pensacola, FL 32503

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Florida Home Builders Association (State)
    Local # 1000
    PO Box 1259
    Tallahassee, FL 32302

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Columbia County Builders Association
    Local # 1007
    PO Box 7353
    Lake City, FL 32055

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10

    Northeast Florida Builders Association
    Local # 1024
    103 Century 21 Dr Ste 100
    Jacksonville, FL 32216

    Chipley Florida Building Expert 10/ 10


    Building Expert News and Information
    For Chipley Florida


    Low Interest Rates Encourages Homeowners to become Landlords

    Subcontractors Have a Duty to Clarify Ambiguities in Bid Documents

    California Fears El Nino's Dark Side Will Bring More Trouble

    Toward Increased Citizen Engagement in Urban Planning

    A Relatively Small Exception to Fraud and Contract Don’t Mix

    Presidential Memorandum Promotes Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West

    Schools Remain Top Priority in Carolinas as Cleanup From Storms Continues

    #11 CDJ Topic: Cortez Blu Community Association, Inc. v. K. Hovnanian at Cortez Hill, LLC, et al.

    Even with LEED, Clear Specifications and Proper Documentation are Necessary

    Construction Defect Fund Approved for Bankrupt Las Vegas Builder

    Court Denies Insurers' Motions for Summary Judgment Under All Risk Policies

    Consider the Risks Associated with an Exculpatory Clause

    Coverage Established for Property Damage Caused by Added Product

    Attorneys’ Fees Are Available in Arizona Eviction Actions

    Corps Proposes $4.6B Plan to Steel Miami for Storm Surge

    Trump, Infrastructure and the Construction Industry

    'Major' Mass. Gas Leak Follows Feds Call For Regulation Changes One Year After Deadly Gas Explosions

    Construction Slow to Begin in Superstorm Sandy Cases

    French President Vows to Rebuild Fire-Collapsed Notre Dame Roof and Iconic Spire

    Axa Buys London Pinnacle Site for Redesigned Skyscraper

    Plaintiffs’ Claims in Barry v. Weyerhaeuser Company are Likely to Proceed after Initial Hurdle

    Sometimes, Being too Cute with Pleading Allegations is Unnecessary

    Preparing For the Worst with Smart Books & Records

    White and Williams LLP Secures Affirmation of Denial to Change Trial Settings Based on Plaintiffs’ Failure to Meet the Texas Causation Standard for Asbestos Cases

    HB 20-1046 - Private Retainage Reform - Postponed Indefinitely

    Navigating Abandonment of a Construction Project

    Ten-Year Statute Of Repose To Sue For Latent Construction Defects

    Florida’s Fourth District Appeals Court Clarifies What Actions Satisfy Florida’s Construction Defect Statute of Repose

    No Rest for the Weary: Project Completion Is the Beginning of Litigation

    Helsinki Stream City: A Re-imagining Outside the System

    New Notary Language For Mechanics Lien Releases and Stop Payment Notice Releases

    Montana Theater Threatened by Closure due to Building Safety

    Quick Note: Submitting Civil Remedy Notice

    ‘Like a War Zone’: Malibu Fire Ravages Multimillion-Dollar Homes

    As the Term Winds Down, Several Important Regulatory Cases Await the U.S. Supreme Court

    Nevada Assembly Passes Construction Defect Bill

    As Climate Changes, 'Underwater Mortgage' May Take on New Meaning

    Good Ole Duty to Defend

    Massachusetts Judge Holds That Insurer Breached Its Duty To Defend Lawsuit After Chemical Spill

    Arbitration—No Opportunity for Appeal

    Legal Matters Escalate in Aspen Condo Case

    Contract Construction Smarts: Helpful Provisions for Dispute Resolution

    Ohio Condo Owners Sue Builder, Alleging Construction Defects

    Insurance Policies Broadly Defining “Suits” May Prompt an Insurer’s Duty to Defend and Indemnify During the Chapter 558 Pre-Suit Notice Process

    Millennials Skip the Ring and Mortgage

    Consequential Damages Flowing from Construction Defect Not Covered Under Florida Law

    Construction Contract Clauses Which Go Bump in the Night – Part 1

    Mortgage Interest Rates Increase on Newly Built Homes

    As Laura Wreaks Havoc Along The Gulf, Is Your Insurance Ready to Respond?

    Colorado “property damage” caused by an “occurrence” and exclusions j(5) and j(6) “that particular part”
    Corporate Profile

    CHIPLEY FLORIDA BUILDING EXPERT
    DIRECTORY AND CAPABILITIES

    The Chipley, Florida Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Leveraging from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Chipley's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Chipley, Florida

    Home Prices Up in Metro Regions

    October 30, 2013 —
    Housing prices in the largest metro regions beat expectations, rising 12.8% in August as compared to a year before. Analysts were expecting weaker increases; instead these have been the fastest increases in seven years. The metropolitan area with the largest increase was Las Vegas, where houses increased in price by 29.2%. Three California regions — San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego — also saw increases of greater than 20%. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    ‘Like a War Zone’: Malibu Fire Ravages Multimillion-Dollar Homes

    December 04, 2018 —
    Malibu resident Lance Schultz was jolted awake at 2 a.m. Friday with word that he needed to evacuate. With a roaring fire approaching the coastal community, he gathered his girlfriend, dog and 8-month-old son and headed to nearby Zuma Beach. He returned Sunday to survey the damage. His home was saved after his girlfriend’s 82-year-old father returned to hose down the property he had built years before. But Schultz estimates about one-fifth of the houses in the neighborhood are gone, including a mansion down the block that was on sale for $16 million. Much of the rest of the area is covered in black soot. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of John Gittelsohn, Anousha Sakoui, & Christopher Palmeri, Bloomberg

    Idaho Federal Court Rules Against Sacketts After SCOTUS Decided Judicial Review of an EPA Compliance Order was Permissible

    May 13, 2019 —
    In a decision released on March 31, in Sackett v. EPA, the U.S. District Court for Idaho held, without benefit of oral argument, that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) motion for summary judgment should be granted, and accordingly, the Sacketts had violated the Clean Water Act (CWA) by making improvements to 0.63 acres of land they owned without a required CWA permit when the land qualified as a “wetlands.” The EPA had determined the Sacketts’ “property is subject to the CWA because it contains wetlands adjacent to Priest Lake, a traditionally ‘navigable water,’ and, additionally, their property is wetland adjacent to a tributary and similarly situated to other wetlands and has a significant nexus to Priest Lake.” The District Court rejected the Sacketts’ arguments that their property was not a “wetlands” subject to the CWA. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Anthony B. Cavender, Pillsbury
    Mr. Cavender may be contacted at anthony.cavender@pillsburylaw.com

    Hawaii Supreme Court Tackles "Other Insurance" Issues

    February 25, 2014 —
    Responding to four certified questions from the Ninth Circuit, the Hawaii Supreme Court addressed various issues raised by competing "other insurance" provisions in two CGL policies. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. Lexington Ins. Co., 2014 Haw. LEXIS 59 (Haw. Feb. 13, 2014). Coverage for a development on Maui was at issue. The developer, VP & PK (ML) LLC, was insured by Lexington. The other insurance provision in Lexington's policy provided it was excess over "any other primary insurance available to you covering liability for damages arising out of the premises . . . for which you have been added as an additional insured." Kila Kila Construction was one of VP & PK's subcontractors. Kika Kila was not an additional insured under Lexington's policy. Kila Kila had its own CGL policy with Nautilus. The Nautilus other insurance clause stated the insurance was excess over "any other primary insurance available to you covering liability arising out of the premises or operations for which you ahve been added as an additional insured." An endorsement added VP & PK as an additional insured, but only for liability arising out of Kila Kila's negligence. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    New Rule Prohibits Use of Funds For Certain DoD Construction and Infrastructure Programs and Projects

    May 30, 2018 —
    Recently, our colleagues Glenn Sweatt and Alex Ginsberg published their Client Alert titled DFARS Clause Blocks Funding for Unsafe Projects in Afghanistan, Recently published regulation implements the FY17 NDAA to prohibit use of funds for DoD construction and infrastructure programs and projects in Afghanistan that cannot be safely accessed by U.S. Government personnel. Takeaways include:
    New rule prevents Government contracting officers from funding projects that are not able to be safely accessed by Government civilian or military personnel, as these may pose an increased risk of fraud, corruption or waste, or lack efficient oversight.
    Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Pillsbury's Construction & Real Estate Law Team

    Contingent Business Interruption Claim Denied

    April 08, 2014 —
    The insured's claim for contingent business interruption ("CBI") coverage was denied in Millennium Inorganic Chemicals Ltd. v. Nat. Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh Pa., 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3096 (4th Cir. Feb. 20, 2014). Millenium processed titanium dioxide, a compound used for its white pigmentation, at its plant in Western Australia. Millennium purchased natural gas to process the titanium dioxide from Alinta Sales Pty Ltd., a natural gas supplier. Alinta purchased gas from Apache Corporation. Once Apache processed the natural gas, it was injected into a pipeline. The gas from Apache's facility was commingled with that obtained from other producers, resulting in a mix of gas in a single pipeline. Alinta had sole ownership of the gas once it entered the pipeline. Under Alinta's contract with Millennium, title to the gas passed to Millenium only at the time of delivery, i.e., when the gas left the pipeline and was delivered to Millennium's facility through a separate delivery line. Millennium had no contract or business relationship with Apache, and the contract it had with Alinta made no reference to Apache. An explosion occurred at Apache's facility causing its natural gas production to cease. As a result, Millennium's gas supply was curtailed, and it was force to shut down its operations for a number of months. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at te@hawaiilawyer.com

    Traub Lieberman Attorneys Recognized as 2021 Top Lawyers by Hudson Valley Magazine

    February 08, 2021 —
    Thirteen Traub Lieberman attorneys have been named 2021 Top Lawyers by Hudson Valley magazine. The honored attorneys represent the firm's Hawthorne New York office and six practice areas. Hudson Valley magazine uses online peer-voting and an internet search process to select outstanding lawyers from more than 30 practice areas, who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. "We are very proud of all of our attorneys for being recognized as among the top lawyers in the Hudson Valley,” said Partner and Vice-Chair Lisa Shrewsberry. Related Attorneys: Sara Kiridly, Mario Castellitto, Colleen E. Hastie, Timothy G. McNamara, Robert S. Nobel, Richard J. Rogers, Adam Krauss, Taylor C. Eagan, Stephen D. Straus, Lisa L. Shrewsberry, Lisa M. Rolle, Jonathan R. Harwood, Hillary J. Raimondi Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Traub Lieberman

    Render Unto Caesar: Considerations for Returning Withheld Sums

    January 18, 2021 —
    Withholding sums during a dispute can be an effective and perfectly legitimate means to protect against the harms caused by another party’s breach. However, withholding too much money during a dispute can turn a position of strength into one of weakness. “Why should I fund the other side’s litigation war chest?” and “Isn’t this just a display of weakness?” are common questions raised by contractors when this issue is discussed. Often, the contractor is well within its contractual or legal rights to withhold money from a breaching subcontractor (another topic for another day). But it may not always be in a contractor’s best interest to withhold every single penny available. This article addresses some of the long-term implications for failing to return withheld sums, including the potential to recover attorneys’ fees, possible bad faith, accruing interest, and overall litigation costs. Admittedly, it can be hard to give money back in the middle of a dispute. But sometimes it can positively impact the overall outcome of the case. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of William E. Underwood, Jones Walker LLP (ConsensusDocs)
    Mr. Underwood may be contacted at wunderwood@joneswalker.com