• Nationwide: (800) 482-1822    
    townhome construction building expert Burien Washington landscaping construction building expert Burien Washington condominiums building expert Burien Washington custom homes building expert Burien Washington Subterranean parking building expert Burien Washington hospital construction building expert Burien Washington Medical building building expert Burien Washington low-income housing building expert Burien Washington custom home building expert Burien Washington production housing building expert Burien Washington retail construction building expert Burien Washington institutional building building expert Burien Washington parking structure building expert Burien Washington multi family housing building expert Burien Washington mid-rise construction building expert Burien Washington industrial building building expert Burien Washington structural steel construction building expert Burien Washington housing building expert Burien Washington office building building expert Burien Washington tract home building expert Burien Washington casino resort building expert Burien Washington condominium building expert Burien Washington
    Burien Washington building consultant expertBurien Washington testifying construction expert witnessBurien Washington expert witnesses fenestrationBurien Washington construction project management expert witnessBurien Washington OSHA expert witness constructionBurien Washington expert witness windowsBurien Washington expert witness concrete failure
    Arrange No Cost Consultation
    Building Expert Builders Information
    Burien, Washington

    Washington Builders Right To Repair Current Law Summary:

    Current Law Summary: (SB 5536) The legislature passed a contractor protection bill that reduces contractors' exposure to lawsuits to six years from 12, and gives builders seven "affirmative defenses" to counter defect complaints from homeowners. Claimant must provide notice no later than 45 days before filing action; within 21 days of notice of claim, "construction professional" must serve response; claimant must accept or reject inspection proposal or settlement offer within 30 days; within 14 days following inspection, construction pro must serve written offer to remedy/compromise/settle; claimant can reject all offers; statutes of limitations are tolled until 60 days after period of time during which filing of action is barred under section 3 of the act. This law applies to single-family dwellings and condos.

    Building Expert Contractors Licensing
    Guidelines Burien Washington

    A license is required for plumbing, and electrical trades. Businesses must register with the Secretary of State.

    Building Expert Contractors Building Industry
    Association Directory
    Building Industry Association of Clark County
    Local # 4908
    103 E 29th St
    Vancouver, WA 98663

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Lower Columbia Contr Assoc
    Local # 4922
    PO Box 2306
    Longview, WA 98632

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Home Builders Association of Tri-Cities
    Local # 4911
    10001 W Clearwater Ave
    Kennewick, WA 99336

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Lewis-Clark Home Builders Association
    Local # 1310
    1313 6TH ST
    CLARKSTON, WA 99403

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Central Washington Home Builders Association
    Local # 4909
    3301 W Nob Hill Blvd
    Yakima, WA 98902

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Industry Association of Washington-State
    Local # 4900
    111 W 21st Avenue
    Olympia, WA 98501

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Olympia Master Builders
    Local # 4933
    1211 State Ave NE
    Olympia, WA 98506

    Burien Washington Building Expert 10/ 10

    Building Expert News and Information
    For Burien Washington

    Exception to Watercraft Exclusion Does Not Apply

    Residential Construction Rise Expected to Continue

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court Adopts New Rule in Breach-of-the-Consent-to-Settle-Clause Cases

    Naughty or Nice. Contractor Receives Two Lumps of Coal in Administrative Dispute

    Housing Starts in U.S. Drop to Lowest Level in Three Months

    Considering Stormwater Management

    Missouri Construction Company Sues Carpenter Union for Threatening Behavior

    Contractor Pleads Guilty to Disadvantaged-Business Fraud

    Boilerplate Contract Language on Permits could cause Problems for Contractors

    Unwrapped Pipes Lead to Flooding and Construction Defect Lawsuit

    Plan Ahead for the Inevitable Murphy’s Law Related Accident


    Court finds subcontractor responsible for defending claim

    Class Actions Under California’s Right to Repair Act. Nope. Well . . . Nope.

    Hawaii Court of Appeals Affirms Broker's Liability for Failure to Renew Coverage

    Firm Seeks to Squash Subpoena in Coverage CD Case

    Ambitious Building Plans in Boston

    Union THUGS Plead Guilty

    Preserving your Rights to Secure Payment on Construction Projects (with Examples)

    “Professional Best Efforts” part 2– Reservation of Rights for Engineers who agree to “best” efforts? (law note)

    Travelers v. Larimer County and the Concept of Covered Cause of Loss

    No Coverage for Sink Hole Loss

    Fire Tests Inspire More Robust Timber Product Standard

    New LG Headquarters Project Challenged because of Height

    Did the Building Boom Lead to a Boom in Construction Defects?

    Melissa Dewey Brumback Invited Into Claims & Litigation Management Alliance Membership

    At $350 Million, Beverly Hillbillies Mansion Is Most Expensive in U.S.

    Treasure Island Sues Beach Trail Designer over Concrete Defects

    Flexible Seattle Off-Ramp Would Retain Shape in Quake

    ICE Said to Seek Mortgage Role Through Talks With Data Service

    McGraw Hill to Sell off Construction-Data Unit

    2017 California Employment Law Update

    Ex-Pemex CEO Denies Allegations of Involvement in Brazil Scandal

    How Well Do You Know the 2012 IECC Code?

    A New Perspective on Mapping Construction Sites with the Crane Camera System

    Contingent Business Interruption Claim Denied

    Cameron Pledges to Double Starter Homes to Boost Supply

    Third Circuit Follows Pennsylvania Law - Damage Caused by Faulty Workmanship Does Not Arise from an Occurrence

    Year and a Half Old Las Vegas VA Emergency Room Gets Rebuilt

    URGENT: 'Catching Some Hell': Hurricane Michael Slams Into Florida

    Legal Fallout Begins Over Delayed Edmonton Bridges

    Contractors Sued for Slip

    General Contractor Cited for Safety Violations after Worker Fatality

    Skyline Bling: A $430 Million Hairpin Tower and Other Naked Bids for Tourism

    When Can a General Contractor’s Knowledge be Imputed to a Developer?

    Signs of a Slowdown in Luxury Condos

    Houston Bond Issue Jump-Starts 237 Flood Control Projects

    New Jersey Law regarding Prior Expert’s Testimony

    Court Addresses HOA Attempt to Restrict Short Term Rentals

    No Jail Time for Disbarred Construction Defect Lawyer
    Corporate Profile


    The Burien, Washington Building Expert Group at BHA, leverages from the experience gained through more than 5,500 construction related expert witness designations encompassing a wide spectrum of construction related disputes. Drawing from this considerable body of experience, BHA provides construction related trial support and expert services to Burien's most recognized construction litigation practitioners, commercial general liability carriers, owners, construction practice groups, as well as a variety of state and local government agencies.

    Building Expert News & Info
    Burien, Washington

    Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail”

    June 05, 2017 —
    On February 10, 2017, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held that if a builder fails to acknowledge receipt of a homeowner’s Notice of Claim within 14 days, as required by the Right to Repair Act (“SB800”), specifically California Civil Code §913, the homeowner is released from the requirements of SB800 and may proceed with the filing of a lawsuit. In Blanchette v. Superior Court, Blanchette owned 1 of 28 homes constructed by GHA Enterprises, Inc. (“GHA”). On February 2, 2016, Blanchette served GHA with notice of a claim, setting forth the alleged defects in all 28 homes. On February 23, 2016, GHA responded that the construction defects were not alleged with sufficient “reasonable detail” as required by Civil Code §910. In response, Blanchette asserted that GHA’s response was untimely and thus excused him and the other homeowners from any obligations under SB800. The trial court found for the builder, GHA, holding that Blanchette’s Notice of Claim lacked detail sufficient to trigger GHA’s obligations under SB800. Blanchette appealed the ruling. Reprinted courtesy of Richard H. Glucksman, Chapman Glucksman Dean Roeb & Barger and David A. Napper, Chapman Glucksman Dean Roeb & Barger Mr. Glucksman may be contacted at Mr. Napper may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Residential Construction Rise Expected to Continue

    May 10, 2013 —
    Housingwire reports that Fannie Mae has predicted strong increases in housing starts over the last few years, with an expected return to normal by 2016. If this holds true, residential construction will include 2.5 million jobs. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Florida Governor Signs Construction Defect Amendments into Law

    September 17, 2015 —
    According to Jeffrey Gilbert and Anaysa Gallardo Stutzman of Cozen O’Connor, Rick Scott, governor of Florida, signed HB 87 into law, which “amends the notice and opportunity to cure provisions of Chapter 558, Florida’s Construction Defect Statute.” The amendments go into effect October first. HB 87 requires “property owners to provide concrete details of the alleged defects.” Gilbert and Stutzman claimed, “Overall, these amendments seek to further the intended public policy purpose of Chapter 558, which is to provide an alternative dispute resolution mechanism and result in fewer lawsuits and lower litigation costs incurred by parties involved in construction defect matters.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Consumer Protections for California Residential Solar Energy Systems

    September 25, 2018 —
    It was already the case that in order to offer to install California residential solar energy systems, a contractor must be licensed by the California Contractors State License Board (CSLB) and must hold an appropriate specialty classification. Under AB 1070 enacted late last year (Chapter 662, Statutes of 2017), special consumer protections are being deployed for the benefit of homeowners. Those protections are steadily rolling out. Step one is the requirement of new Business & Professions Code (B&P Code) Section 7169 that, as of January 1, 2019, a disclosure document must be provided to consumers prior to sale and included on page 1 of the sale contract. The initial version of this document, which was developed by the CSLB and endorsed on August 23, 2018 by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), is available here. The disclosure requirement doesn’t apply to systems included in new home construction. Reprinted courtesy of Robert A. James, Pillsbury and Alexandra Brandt, Pillsbury Mr. James may be contacted at Ms. Brandt may be contacted at Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    The Prompt Payment Act Obligation is Not Triggered When the Owner Holds Less Retention from the General Contractor

    October 27, 2016 —
    Most states have laws known as “prompt payment” statutes which govern the timing of payments on public works projects[i] from project owners to general contractors, and from general contractors to subcontractors.[ii] The purpose of these statutes is to ensure that contractors and subcontractors who may have less leverage than the project owners and prime contractors, respectively, are paid for their work on a timely basis. Prompt Payment Act cases are rare, and, since many of the prompt payment statutes are founded on the same principles, when we come across a Prompt Payment Act case, it is “blog worthy.” This dispute arose from the construction of the Exposition Light Rail Line Project connecting downtown Los Angeles with Culver City on which FCI/Fluor/Parsons (“FFP”) was the prime contractor, and Bloise Construction, Inc. (“Bloise”) was the excavation subcontractor to FFP. Under the prime contract, Expo,[iii] the owner, was permitted to withhold ten percent of the payments owed to FFP, and FFP, pursuant to its subcontract with Bloise, was entitled to also withhold ten percent of the payments to Bloise as retention. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of John P. Ahlers, Ahlers & Cressman, PLLC
    Mr. Ahlers may be contacted at

    No Retrofit without Repurposing in Los Angeles

    October 21, 2013 —
    The Los Angeles Times has continued its series on the seismic safety of buildings in downtown Los Angeles. According to the article, Los Angeles only requires seismic retrofits of buildings if their purpose is being changed. One investor, Izak Shomof, bought a residential hotel and kept it as one to avoid retrofitting the building. He converted an office building to upscale residences and so the building was strengthened. His son, Eric Shomof, keeps an office in the unreinforced building. He said if more retrofitting were required, “you’d see a lot more vacant buildings down here,” describing the process as “not cheap.” Depending on whether or when a building has changed its use, the concrete buildings of downtown Los Angeles may or may not be protected against failure in an earthquake. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    New American Home Construction Nears Completion Despite Obstacles

    January 29, 2014 —
    Construction of the New American Home in Las Vegas, Nevada, to be completed for the 2014 International Builders’ Show, has faced enormous challenges, according to Jennifer Goodman writing for Big Builder. Josh Anderson, owner of Element Building Co., told Goodman “he couldn’t have imagined what lay ahead when he signed on in fall 2012 to the project, which is co-sponsored by BUILDER and the NAHB.” Challenges began during the “design phase” when Anderson “was troubled by the sitting of the house on its lot in the tony Sky Terrace subdivision.” Furthermore, he “balked at the floor plan, which encompassed a traditional design aesthetic and opulent touches.” The project’s architect, Barry Berkus, passed away in late 2012, and his son, Jeffrey Berkus, took over for him. After the plans were “complete and approved by the city,” a labor shortage in Las Vegas made it “particularly difficult to find skilled framers.” The shortage also increased labor costs. Anderson also contended with weather anomalies: “Over the summer, the area set a record for the most consecutive wet days in 30 years. Winds blew sawdust and rain into the open structure, ruining 350 sheets of drywall and slowing down construction,” according to Big Builder. The “mammoth project” is close to completion. Anderson told Big Builder, “I’ve always been a sucker for a challenge.” Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of

    Roof's "Cosmetic" Damage From Hail Storm Covered

    August 19, 2015 —
    The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court's determination that cosmetic damage to the insured's roof was covered. Advance Cable Co., LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9805 (7th Cir. June 11, 2015). The insured submitted a claim to its insurer, Cincinnati, for damage to the metal roof of its building caused by a hail storm. The insured inspected the roof with a claims representative for Cincinnati. Dents were spotted, but there was little other evidence of damage. The loss was estimated at $1,894.74. A check for this amount was sent to the insured. Six months later, the insured considered selling the building. A potential buyer inspected the roof and found hail damage. At the request of the insured, Cincinnati conducted another inspection of the roof. Again, dents of approximately 1 inch in diameter were found. The inspector noted that the denting would not affect the performance of the roof panels or detract from their life expectancy. Read the court decision
    Read the full story...
    Reprinted courtesy of Tred R. Eyerly, Insurance Law Hawaii
    Mr. Eyerly may be contacted at